帕金森病患者步态辅助装置的评价

Miyoung Kim, B. Lim
{"title":"帕金森病患者步态辅助装置的评价","authors":"Miyoung Kim, B. Lim","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of double support, base of support, and support time) (Bryant et al., 2011). Assistive devices equipped with lasers were developed to improve freezing of gait and step length. Results regarding the effect of four-wheel walkers with lasers have been inconsistent, with one study showing that four-wheel walkers with lasers did not reduce freezing of gait (Cubo et al., 2003) but others suggesting otherwise. To address the inconsis-tency in the results and overcome the limitations of assistive devices, Kegelmeyer, Parthasarathy, Kostyk, White & Kloos (2013) compared the effects of five types of assistive devices (i.e., cane, standard assistive device, two-wheel walker, four-wheel walker, and U-Step walker) on gait parameters in 27 patients with PD. Their findings showed that all of the assistive devices except the four-wheel walkers and U-Step walkers significantly decreased gait speed. Gait variability was lowest with four-wheel walkers and highest with U-Step walkers, suggesting that U-Step walkers are associated with the highest risk of falling. Four-wheel walkers produced consistent improvements in all gait parameters, whereas lasers Objective: There are no guidelines for choosing appropriate gait assistive devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate gait assistive devices in patients with Parkinson's disease. Method: We evaluated 15 individuals with Parkinson's disease who did or did not use one of two different devices including canes and two-wheeled walkers. Data were collected using the GAITRite system. Results: Participants in the group using canes and two-wheeled walkers had significantly increased double support time and decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who did not. Participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who used a cane. Furthermore, participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased coefficients of variation for step time, stride length, and swing time compared with those who used a cane. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the two-wheeled walker offered the most consistent advantages for decreasing the risk of falling.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Gait Assistive Devices in Patients with Parkinson's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Miyoung Kim, B. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of double support, base of support, and support time) (Bryant et al., 2011). Assistive devices equipped with lasers were developed to improve freezing of gait and step length. Results regarding the effect of four-wheel walkers with lasers have been inconsistent, with one study showing that four-wheel walkers with lasers did not reduce freezing of gait (Cubo et al., 2003) but others suggesting otherwise. To address the inconsis-tency in the results and overcome the limitations of assistive devices, Kegelmeyer, Parthasarathy, Kostyk, White & Kloos (2013) compared the effects of five types of assistive devices (i.e., cane, standard assistive device, two-wheel walker, four-wheel walker, and U-Step walker) on gait parameters in 27 patients with PD. Their findings showed that all of the assistive devices except the four-wheel walkers and U-Step walkers significantly decreased gait speed. Gait variability was lowest with four-wheel walkers and highest with U-Step walkers, suggesting that U-Step walkers are associated with the highest risk of falling. Four-wheel walkers produced consistent improvements in all gait parameters, whereas lasers Objective: There are no guidelines for choosing appropriate gait assistive devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate gait assistive devices in patients with Parkinson's disease. Method: We evaluated 15 individuals with Parkinson's disease who did or did not use one of two different devices including canes and two-wheeled walkers. Data were collected using the GAITRite system. Results: Participants in the group using canes and two-wheeled walkers had significantly increased double support time and decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who did not. Participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who used a cane. Furthermore, participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased coefficients of variation for step time, stride length, and swing time compared with those who used a cane. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the two-wheeled walker offered the most consistent advantages for decreasing the risk of falling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

双支撑、支撑基础和支撑时间)(Bryant et al., 2011)。辅助装置配备了激光,以改善冻结步态和步长。关于激光四轮步行器的效果的结果一直不一致,有一项研究表明激光四轮步行器并没有减少步态冻结(Cubo等人,2003),但其他研究则相反。为了解决研究结果的不一致性,克服辅助器具的局限性,Kegelmeyer, Parthasarathy, Kostyk, White & Kloos(2013)比较了5种辅助器具(手杖、标准辅助器具、两轮助行器、四轮助行器和u步助行器)对27例PD患者步态参数的影响。他们的研究结果表明,除了四轮步行者和u型步行者外,所有的辅助设备都显著降低了步态速度。步态变异性在四轮步行者中最低,在u型步行者中最高,这表明u型步行者摔倒的风险最高。四轮助行器在所有步态参数方面都有一致的改善,而激光助行器目的:没有选择合适的步态辅助装置的指南。本研究的目的是评估帕金森病患者的步态辅助装置。方法:我们评估了15名帕金森病患者,他们使用或不使用两种不同的设备之一,包括手杖和两轮助行器。使用GAITRite系统收集数据。结果:与不使用手杖和两轮助行器的参与者相比,使用手杖和两轮助行器的参与者双支撑时间明显增加,步态速度、标准化步态速度和步长明显减少。与使用手杖的参与者相比,使用两轮助行器的参与者的步态速度、标准化步态速度和步幅都显著降低。此外,与使用手杖的参与者相比,使用两轮助行器的参与者的步长、步幅和摆动时间的变异系数显著降低。结论:我们的研究结果表明,两轮助行器在降低跌倒风险方面提供了最一致的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Gait Assistive Devices in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
of double support, base of support, and support time) (Bryant et al., 2011). Assistive devices equipped with lasers were developed to improve freezing of gait and step length. Results regarding the effect of four-wheel walkers with lasers have been inconsistent, with one study showing that four-wheel walkers with lasers did not reduce freezing of gait (Cubo et al., 2003) but others suggesting otherwise. To address the inconsis-tency in the results and overcome the limitations of assistive devices, Kegelmeyer, Parthasarathy, Kostyk, White & Kloos (2013) compared the effects of five types of assistive devices (i.e., cane, standard assistive device, two-wheel walker, four-wheel walker, and U-Step walker) on gait parameters in 27 patients with PD. Their findings showed that all of the assistive devices except the four-wheel walkers and U-Step walkers significantly decreased gait speed. Gait variability was lowest with four-wheel walkers and highest with U-Step walkers, suggesting that U-Step walkers are associated with the highest risk of falling. Four-wheel walkers produced consistent improvements in all gait parameters, whereas lasers Objective: There are no guidelines for choosing appropriate gait assistive devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate gait assistive devices in patients with Parkinson's disease. Method: We evaluated 15 individuals with Parkinson's disease who did or did not use one of two different devices including canes and two-wheeled walkers. Data were collected using the GAITRite system. Results: Participants in the group using canes and two-wheeled walkers had significantly increased double support time and decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who did not. Participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased gait velocity, normalized gait velocity, and stride length compared with those who used a cane. Furthermore, participants who used a two-wheeled walker had significantly decreased coefficients of variation for step time, stride length, and swing time compared with those who used a cane. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the two-wheeled walker offered the most consistent advantages for decreasing the risk of falling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信