对抗性攻击与防御下图像分类模型的定量比较

Kartikeya Khullar, Sarthak Kathuria, Nishant Chahar, Prince Gupta, Preeti Kaur
{"title":"对抗性攻击与防御下图像分类模型的定量比较","authors":"Kartikeya Khullar, Sarthak Kathuria, Nishant Chahar, Prince Gupta, Preeti Kaur","doi":"10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9565948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comparison of the performance of two state-of-the-art model architectures under Adversarial attacks. These are attacks that are designed to trick trained machine learning models. The models compared in this paper perform commendable on the popular image classification dataset CIFAR-10. To generate these adversarial examples for the attack, we are using two strategies, the first one being a very popular attack based on the L∞ metric. And the other one is a relatively new technique that covers fundamentally different types of adversarial examples generated using the Wasserstein distance. We will also be applying two adversarial defenses, preprocessing the input and adversarial training. The comparative results show that even these new state-of-the-art techniques are susceptible to adversarial attacks. Also, we concluded that more studies on adversarial defences are required and current defence techniques must be adopted in real-world applications.","PeriodicalId":343177,"journal":{"name":"2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quantitative Comparison of Image Classification Models under Adversarial Attacks and Defenses\",\"authors\":\"Kartikeya Khullar, Sarthak Kathuria, Nishant Chahar, Prince Gupta, Preeti Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9565948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a comparison of the performance of two state-of-the-art model architectures under Adversarial attacks. These are attacks that are designed to trick trained machine learning models. The models compared in this paper perform commendable on the popular image classification dataset CIFAR-10. To generate these adversarial examples for the attack, we are using two strategies, the first one being a very popular attack based on the L∞ metric. And the other one is a relatively new technique that covers fundamentally different types of adversarial examples generated using the Wasserstein distance. We will also be applying two adversarial defenses, preprocessing the input and adversarial training. The comparative results show that even these new state-of-the-art techniques are susceptible to adversarial attacks. Also, we concluded that more studies on adversarial defences are required and current defence techniques must be adopted in real-world applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9565948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9565948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了两种最先进的模型架构在对抗性攻击下的性能。这些攻击旨在欺骗训练有素的机器学习模型。本文所比较的模型在流行的图像分类数据集CIFAR-10上表现良好。为了生成这些攻击的对抗性示例,我们使用了两种策略,第一种是基于L∞度量的非常流行的攻击。另一个是一个相对较新的技术,它涵盖了使用沃瑟斯坦距离生成的不同类型的对抗样本。我们还将应用两种对抗性防御,预处理输入和对抗性训练。对比结果表明,即使是这些新的最先进的技术也容易受到对抗性攻击。此外,我们得出结论,需要更多的对抗性防御研究,当前的防御技术必须在现实世界的应用中采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Quantitative Comparison of Image Classification Models under Adversarial Attacks and Defenses
In this paper, we present a comparison of the performance of two state-of-the-art model architectures under Adversarial attacks. These are attacks that are designed to trick trained machine learning models. The models compared in this paper perform commendable on the popular image classification dataset CIFAR-10. To generate these adversarial examples for the attack, we are using two strategies, the first one being a very popular attack based on the L∞ metric. And the other one is a relatively new technique that covers fundamentally different types of adversarial examples generated using the Wasserstein distance. We will also be applying two adversarial defenses, preprocessing the input and adversarial training. The comparative results show that even these new state-of-the-art techniques are susceptible to adversarial attacks. Also, we concluded that more studies on adversarial defences are required and current defence techniques must be adopted in real-world applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信