[随机对照试验统计分析中如何处理模棱两可的受试者]。

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi Pub Date : 1990-08-20
N Hamajima, R Ohno
{"title":"[随机对照试验统计分析中如何处理模棱两可的受试者]。","authors":"N Hamajima,&nbsp;R Ohno","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In randomized controlled trials, it is likely that several subjects with atypical features are registered. In this paper, it was discussed from a statistical point of view how properly the subjects with the following atypical features could be dealt with; 1) subjects who were found to be not eligible for the trial after randomization, 2) subjects who did not receive the assigned regimen by the treatment protocol, 3) subjects whose outcome was ambiguous as the designated endpoint, and 4) subjects who were ambiguous whether to be regarded as censored cases. It was also emphasized that informations on equivocal subjects should be masked in the committee which is responsible for the statistical judgement. Plausible examples were added to assist the readers to understand the rules discussed here.</p>","PeriodicalId":76232,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","volume":"25 8","pages":"1537-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How to deal with equivocal subjects in statistical analysis of randomized controlled trials].\",\"authors\":\"N Hamajima,&nbsp;R Ohno\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In randomized controlled trials, it is likely that several subjects with atypical features are registered. In this paper, it was discussed from a statistical point of view how properly the subjects with the following atypical features could be dealt with; 1) subjects who were found to be not eligible for the trial after randomization, 2) subjects who did not receive the assigned regimen by the treatment protocol, 3) subjects whose outcome was ambiguous as the designated endpoint, and 4) subjects who were ambiguous whether to be regarded as censored cases. It was also emphasized that informations on equivocal subjects should be masked in the committee which is responsible for the statistical judgement. Plausible examples were added to assist the readers to understand the rules discussed here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"1537-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在随机对照试验中,可能会登记几个具有非典型特征的受试者。本文从统计学的角度讨论了如何正确处理具有以下非典型特征的受试者;1)随机化后发现不符合试验条件的受试者,2)未按照治疗方案接受指定方案的受试者,3)结局作为指定终点不明确的受试者,以及4)是否被视为审查病例不明确的受试者。还有人强调,在负责统计判断的委员会中,关于模棱两可的问题的资料应加以掩盖。为了帮助读者理解这里讨论的规则,还添加了一些合理的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[How to deal with equivocal subjects in statistical analysis of randomized controlled trials].

In randomized controlled trials, it is likely that several subjects with atypical features are registered. In this paper, it was discussed from a statistical point of view how properly the subjects with the following atypical features could be dealt with; 1) subjects who were found to be not eligible for the trial after randomization, 2) subjects who did not receive the assigned regimen by the treatment protocol, 3) subjects whose outcome was ambiguous as the designated endpoint, and 4) subjects who were ambiguous whether to be regarded as censored cases. It was also emphasized that informations on equivocal subjects should be masked in the committee which is responsible for the statistical judgement. Plausible examples were added to assist the readers to understand the rules discussed here.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信