在线社交网络的无偏抽样分析

Siyao Wang, Bo Liu, Jiajun Zhou, Guangpeng Li
{"title":"在线社交网络的无偏抽样分析","authors":"Siyao Wang, Bo Liu, Jiajun Zhou, Guangpeng Li","doi":"10.2991/ICMEIT-19.2019.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The study of social graph structure has become extremely popular with the development of the Online Social Network (OSN). The main bottleneck is that the large account of social data makes it difficult to obtain and analyze, which consume extensive bandwidth, storage and computing resources. Thus unbiased sampling of OSN makes it possible to get accurate and representative properties of OSN graph. The widely used algorithm, Breadth-First Sampling (BFS)and Random Walking (RW) both are proved that there exists substantial bias towards high-degree nodes. By contrast the Metropolis-Hasting random walking (MHRW), re-weighted random walking (RWRW) and the unbiased sampling with reduced self-loop (USRS)which are all based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC) method could produce approximate uniform samples. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences among the four algorithms, and show the performance of unbiased estimation and crawling efficient on the data set of Facebook. In addition, we provide formal convergence test to determine when the crawling process attain an equilibrium state and the number of nodes should be discarded.","PeriodicalId":223458,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Information Technology (ICMEIT 2019)","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbiased Sampling Method Analysis on Online Social Network\",\"authors\":\"Siyao Wang, Bo Liu, Jiajun Zhou, Guangpeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICMEIT-19.2019.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The study of social graph structure has become extremely popular with the development of the Online Social Network (OSN). The main bottleneck is that the large account of social data makes it difficult to obtain and analyze, which consume extensive bandwidth, storage and computing resources. Thus unbiased sampling of OSN makes it possible to get accurate and representative properties of OSN graph. The widely used algorithm, Breadth-First Sampling (BFS)and Random Walking (RW) both are proved that there exists substantial bias towards high-degree nodes. By contrast the Metropolis-Hasting random walking (MHRW), re-weighted random walking (RWRW) and the unbiased sampling with reduced self-loop (USRS)which are all based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC) method could produce approximate uniform samples. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences among the four algorithms, and show the performance of unbiased estimation and crawling efficient on the data set of Facebook. In addition, we provide formal convergence test to determine when the crawling process attain an equilibrium state and the number of nodes should be discarded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Information Technology (ICMEIT 2019)\",\"volume\":\"271 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Information Technology (ICMEIT 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICMEIT-19.2019.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Information Technology (ICMEIT 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICMEIT-19.2019.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要随着在线社交网络(Online social Network, OSN)的发展,社交图结构的研究日益受到关注。主要的瓶颈是社交数据量大,难以获取和分析,占用大量的带宽、存储和计算资源。因此,对OSN进行无偏抽样,可以得到准确的、具有代表性的OSN图属性。广泛使用的算法,宽度优先抽样(BFS)和随机行走(RW)都被证明对高节点存在很大的偏差。相比之下,基于马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法的Metropolis-Hasting随机漫步(MHRW)、重加权随机漫步(RWRW)和减小自环无偏抽样(USRS)都能产生近似均匀的样本。在本文中,我们分析了四种算法之间的异同,并展示了在Facebook数据集上无偏估计和爬行效率的性能。此外,我们提供了形式化的收敛性测试,以确定爬行过程何时达到平衡状态以及应该丢弃的节点数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unbiased Sampling Method Analysis on Online Social Network
Abstract. The study of social graph structure has become extremely popular with the development of the Online Social Network (OSN). The main bottleneck is that the large account of social data makes it difficult to obtain and analyze, which consume extensive bandwidth, storage and computing resources. Thus unbiased sampling of OSN makes it possible to get accurate and representative properties of OSN graph. The widely used algorithm, Breadth-First Sampling (BFS)and Random Walking (RW) both are proved that there exists substantial bias towards high-degree nodes. By contrast the Metropolis-Hasting random walking (MHRW), re-weighted random walking (RWRW) and the unbiased sampling with reduced self-loop (USRS)which are all based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC) method could produce approximate uniform samples. In this paper, we analyze the similarities and differences among the four algorithms, and show the performance of unbiased estimation and crawling efficient on the data set of Facebook. In addition, we provide formal convergence test to determine when the crawling process attain an equilibrium state and the number of nodes should be discarded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信