即使DFVS很小或者周长很大,找到长有向循环也是很困难的

Ashwin Jacob, Michał Włodarczyk, M. Zehavi
{"title":"即使DFVS很小或者周长很大,找到长有向循环也是很困难的","authors":"Ashwin Jacob, Michał Włodarczyk, M. Zehavi","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2308.06145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the parameterized complexity of two classic problems on directed graphs: Hamiltonian Cycle and its generalization {\\sc Longest Cycle}. Since 2008, it is known that Hamiltonian Cycle is W[1]-hard when parameterized by directed treewidth [Lampis et al., ISSAC'08]. By now, the question of whether it is FPT parameterized by the directed feedback vertex set (DFVS) number has become a longstanding open problem. In particular, the DFVS number is the largest natural directed width measure studied in the literature. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to the question, showing that even for the DFVS number, the problem remains W[1]-hard. As a consequence, we also obtain that Longest Cycle is W[1]-hard on directed graphs when parameterized multiplicatively above girth, in contrast to the undirected case. This resolves an open question posed by Fomin et al. [ACM ToCT'21] and Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]. Our hardness results apply to the path versions of the problems as well. On the positive side, we show that Longest Path parameterized multiplicatively above girth} belongs to the class XP.","PeriodicalId":201778,"journal":{"name":"Embedded Systems and Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Long Directed Cycles Is Hard Even When DFVS Is Small Or Girth Is Large\",\"authors\":\"Ashwin Jacob, Michał Włodarczyk, M. Zehavi\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2308.06145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the parameterized complexity of two classic problems on directed graphs: Hamiltonian Cycle and its generalization {\\\\sc Longest Cycle}. Since 2008, it is known that Hamiltonian Cycle is W[1]-hard when parameterized by directed treewidth [Lampis et al., ISSAC'08]. By now, the question of whether it is FPT parameterized by the directed feedback vertex set (DFVS) number has become a longstanding open problem. In particular, the DFVS number is the largest natural directed width measure studied in the literature. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to the question, showing that even for the DFVS number, the problem remains W[1]-hard. As a consequence, we also obtain that Longest Cycle is W[1]-hard on directed graphs when parameterized multiplicatively above girth, in contrast to the undirected case. This resolves an open question posed by Fomin et al. [ACM ToCT'21] and Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]. Our hardness results apply to the path versions of the problems as well. On the positive side, we show that Longest Path parameterized multiplicatively above girth} belongs to the class XP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Embedded Systems and Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Embedded Systems and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.06145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Embedded Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.06145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究了有向图上两个经典问题的参数化复杂度:哈密顿循环及其推广{\sc最长循环}。自2008年以来,已知当有向树宽度参数化时,哈密顿循环是W[1]-hard [Lampis et al., ISSAC'08]。目前,有向反馈顶点集(DFVS)数是否为FPT参数化的问题已经成为一个长期存在的开放性问题。特别是,DFVS数是文献中研究过的最大的自然定向宽度度量。在本文中,我们给出了一个否定的答案,表明即使对于DFVS数,问题仍然是W[1]-难。因此,与无向图相比,我们还得到,当参数化乘于周长以上时,有向图的最长周期为W[1]-hard。这解决了Fomin等人[ACM ToCT'21]和Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]提出的开放性问题。我们的硬度结果也适用于路径版本的问题。从积极的方面来看,我们证明了在环数}以上相乘参数化的最长路径属于XP类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finding Long Directed Cycles Is Hard Even When DFVS Is Small Or Girth Is Large
We study the parameterized complexity of two classic problems on directed graphs: Hamiltonian Cycle and its generalization {\sc Longest Cycle}. Since 2008, it is known that Hamiltonian Cycle is W[1]-hard when parameterized by directed treewidth [Lampis et al., ISSAC'08]. By now, the question of whether it is FPT parameterized by the directed feedback vertex set (DFVS) number has become a longstanding open problem. In particular, the DFVS number is the largest natural directed width measure studied in the literature. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to the question, showing that even for the DFVS number, the problem remains W[1]-hard. As a consequence, we also obtain that Longest Cycle is W[1]-hard on directed graphs when parameterized multiplicatively above girth, in contrast to the undirected case. This resolves an open question posed by Fomin et al. [ACM ToCT'21] and Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]. Our hardness results apply to the path versions of the problems as well. On the positive side, we show that Longest Path parameterized multiplicatively above girth} belongs to the class XP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信