基于生态系统的减少灾害风险:衔接缓解和适应以促进社区复原力

Alison C. Sneddon
{"title":"基于生态系统的减少灾害风险:衔接缓解和适应以促进社区复原力","authors":"Alison C. Sneddon","doi":"10.51595/11111166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (eco-DRR) is emerging as an approach to disaster risk reduction which bridges mitigation and adaptation, protecting communities from the impacts of disasters in the short term while building long term resilience by addressing both hazards and vulnerability to them. Wide-ranging experience of implementing eco-DRR initiatives in different contexts and to address different hazards highlights the importance of key considerations on which there is extensive consensus across the literature. Firstly, eco-DRR must be appropriate to the context, necessitating knowledge about the ecosystem, the capacity of the community to sustain it, and the role of hybrid solutions combining eco-DRR with grey engineering solutions. Secondly, meaningful community engagement is vital to the success of eco-DRR. Working with the communities involved is of key importance to ensure the eco-DRR initiative is appropriate, sustainable, and strengthened by local knowledge and expertise. Finally, the benefits of eco-DRR initiatives may take considerable time to be visible. Commitment to long term programming and funding, and ensuring that short-term benefits are realised by the community while the longer term benefits accrue, are essential. These considerations provide useful guidance to the design and delivery of eco-DRR. The literature also highlights priority gaps in the global body of knowledge which future research and learning should work to address: firstly, a need to develop a base of evidence as well as evidence-based standard of practice and guidance, and secondly, a need to understand the relationship between eco-DRR and gender and social inclusion, which is a major gap in the current body of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":123759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Community Resilience","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction: Bridging mitigation and adaptation for community resilience\",\"authors\":\"Alison C. Sneddon\",\"doi\":\"10.51595/11111166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (eco-DRR) is emerging as an approach to disaster risk reduction which bridges mitigation and adaptation, protecting communities from the impacts of disasters in the short term while building long term resilience by addressing both hazards and vulnerability to them. Wide-ranging experience of implementing eco-DRR initiatives in different contexts and to address different hazards highlights the importance of key considerations on which there is extensive consensus across the literature. Firstly, eco-DRR must be appropriate to the context, necessitating knowledge about the ecosystem, the capacity of the community to sustain it, and the role of hybrid solutions combining eco-DRR with grey engineering solutions. Secondly, meaningful community engagement is vital to the success of eco-DRR. Working with the communities involved is of key importance to ensure the eco-DRR initiative is appropriate, sustainable, and strengthened by local knowledge and expertise. Finally, the benefits of eco-DRR initiatives may take considerable time to be visible. Commitment to long term programming and funding, and ensuring that short-term benefits are realised by the community while the longer term benefits accrue, are essential. These considerations provide useful guidance to the design and delivery of eco-DRR. The literature also highlights priority gaps in the global body of knowledge which future research and learning should work to address: firstly, a need to develop a base of evidence as well as evidence-based standard of practice and guidance, and secondly, a need to understand the relationship between eco-DRR and gender and social inclusion, which is a major gap in the current body of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Community Resilience\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Community Resilience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51595/11111166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Community Resilience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51595/11111166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于生态系统的减少灾害风险(eco-DRR)正在成为一种减少灾害风险的方法,它将缓解和适应联系起来,在短期内保护社区免受灾害影响,同时通过解决灾害及其脆弱性建立长期复原力。在不同背景下实施生态减灾倡议和解决不同危害的广泛经验强调了在整个文献中达成广泛共识的关键考虑因素的重要性。首先,生态drr必须与环境相适应,需要了解生态系统、社区维持生态系统的能力,以及将生态drr与灰色工程解决方案相结合的混合解决方案的作用。其次,有意义的社区参与对生态减灾的成功至关重要。与相关社区合作至关重要,以确保生态减灾倡议是适当的、可持续的,并通过当地的知识和专业知识得到加强。最后,生态减灾倡议的效益可能需要相当长的时间才能显现出来。必须致力制订长期的计划和拨款,并确保社区在获得长期利益的同时获得短期利益。这些考虑为生态减灾的设计和实施提供了有益的指导。这些文献还强调了未来研究和学习应努力解决的全球知识体系中的优先差距:首先,需要建立证据基础以及以证据为基础的实践和指导标准;其次,需要了解生态减灾与性别和社会包容之间的关系,这是当前知识体系中的主要差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction: Bridging mitigation and adaptation for community resilience
Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (eco-DRR) is emerging as an approach to disaster risk reduction which bridges mitigation and adaptation, protecting communities from the impacts of disasters in the short term while building long term resilience by addressing both hazards and vulnerability to them. Wide-ranging experience of implementing eco-DRR initiatives in different contexts and to address different hazards highlights the importance of key considerations on which there is extensive consensus across the literature. Firstly, eco-DRR must be appropriate to the context, necessitating knowledge about the ecosystem, the capacity of the community to sustain it, and the role of hybrid solutions combining eco-DRR with grey engineering solutions. Secondly, meaningful community engagement is vital to the success of eco-DRR. Working with the communities involved is of key importance to ensure the eco-DRR initiative is appropriate, sustainable, and strengthened by local knowledge and expertise. Finally, the benefits of eco-DRR initiatives may take considerable time to be visible. Commitment to long term programming and funding, and ensuring that short-term benefits are realised by the community while the longer term benefits accrue, are essential. These considerations provide useful guidance to the design and delivery of eco-DRR. The literature also highlights priority gaps in the global body of knowledge which future research and learning should work to address: firstly, a need to develop a base of evidence as well as evidence-based standard of practice and guidance, and secondly, a need to understand the relationship between eco-DRR and gender and social inclusion, which is a major gap in the current body of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信