利用type-1 OWA操作符来融合引出信息

Wen He, Rosa M. Rodríguez, Bapi Dutta, Luis Martínez
{"title":"利用type-1 OWA操作符来融合引出信息","authors":"Wen He, Rosa M. Rodríguez, Bapi Dutta, Luis Martínez","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a group decision making (GDM) problem, the information is fused to obtain a collective result, which helps to choose the best solution/s to the problem. Recently, a new representation model called Extended Comparative Linguistic Expressions with Symbolic Translation (ELICIT), which extends the representation of the comparative linguistic expressions (CLEs) to a continuous domain combining the advantages of the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and 2-tuple linguistic representation model has been proposed to model experts' preferences. Due to the need of fusing experts' preferences in GDM processes, it is convenient to have enough flexible aggregation operators for such processes. However, so far, only two aggregation operators have been introduced to aggregate ELICIT information in GDM problems, the fuzzy arithmetic mean operator and the Bonferroni mean operator. Thus, it seems necessary to define new aggregation operators with different features to model wide range of decision-making scenarios. One widely used operator to aggregate preferences in decision making is the OWA operator. The key issue to apply the OWA operator is the reordering process of the arguments. However, the ELICIT information does not have an inherent order because it is represented by a fuzzy number. Therefore, the aim of this contribution is to define the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator by using crisp and fuzzy weights, particularly interval weights, and define a multi-criteria group decision making model which applies the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator to fuse the information. Additionally, an experimental study is introduced to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed aggregation operator.","PeriodicalId":151289,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploiting the type-1 OWA operator to fuse the ELICIT information\",\"authors\":\"Wen He, Rosa M. Rodríguez, Bapi Dutta, Luis Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a group decision making (GDM) problem, the information is fused to obtain a collective result, which helps to choose the best solution/s to the problem. Recently, a new representation model called Extended Comparative Linguistic Expressions with Symbolic Translation (ELICIT), which extends the representation of the comparative linguistic expressions (CLEs) to a continuous domain combining the advantages of the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and 2-tuple linguistic representation model has been proposed to model experts' preferences. Due to the need of fusing experts' preferences in GDM processes, it is convenient to have enough flexible aggregation operators for such processes. However, so far, only two aggregation operators have been introduced to aggregate ELICIT information in GDM problems, the fuzzy arithmetic mean operator and the Bonferroni mean operator. Thus, it seems necessary to define new aggregation operators with different features to model wide range of decision-making scenarios. One widely used operator to aggregate preferences in decision making is the OWA operator. The key issue to apply the OWA operator is the reordering process of the arguments. However, the ELICIT information does not have an inherent order because it is represented by a fuzzy number. Therefore, the aim of this contribution is to define the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator by using crisp and fuzzy weights, particularly interval weights, and define a multi-criteria group decision making model which applies the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator to fuse the information. Additionally, an experimental study is introduced to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed aggregation operator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在群体决策(GDM)问题中,信息融合得到一个集体的结果,这有助于选择问题的最佳解决方案。近年来,人们提出了一种新的表征模型——带符号翻译的扩展比较语言表达(Extended Comparative Linguistic Expressions with Symbolic Translation,简称ELICIT),将比较语言表达(CLEs)的表征扩展到一个连续域,结合犹豫模糊语言术语集和二元组语言表征模型的优点,对专家的偏好进行建模。由于GDM过程需要融合专家的偏好,因此为该过程提供足够灵活的聚合算子是很方便的。然而,到目前为止,在GDM问题中只引入了两种聚合算子来聚合引出信息,即模糊算术均值算子和Bonferroni均值算子。因此,似乎有必要定义具有不同特征的新聚合操作符来模拟广泛的决策场景。在决策过程中,一个广泛用于聚合首选项的操作符是OWA操作符。应用OWA操作符的关键问题是参数的重新排序过程。然而,引出信息没有固有的顺序,因为它是由模糊数表示的。因此,本文的目的是通过使用清晰和模糊的权重,特别是区间权重来定义1型引出OWA算子,并定义一个多准则群体决策模型,该模型应用1型引出OWA算子来融合信息。此外,还介绍了实验研究,以验证所提出的聚合算子的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploiting the type-1 OWA operator to fuse the ELICIT information
In a group decision making (GDM) problem, the information is fused to obtain a collective result, which helps to choose the best solution/s to the problem. Recently, a new representation model called Extended Comparative Linguistic Expressions with Symbolic Translation (ELICIT), which extends the representation of the comparative linguistic expressions (CLEs) to a continuous domain combining the advantages of the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and 2-tuple linguistic representation model has been proposed to model experts' preferences. Due to the need of fusing experts' preferences in GDM processes, it is convenient to have enough flexible aggregation operators for such processes. However, so far, only two aggregation operators have been introduced to aggregate ELICIT information in GDM problems, the fuzzy arithmetic mean operator and the Bonferroni mean operator. Thus, it seems necessary to define new aggregation operators with different features to model wide range of decision-making scenarios. One widely used operator to aggregate preferences in decision making is the OWA operator. The key issue to apply the OWA operator is the reordering process of the arguments. However, the ELICIT information does not have an inherent order because it is represented by a fuzzy number. Therefore, the aim of this contribution is to define the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator by using crisp and fuzzy weights, particularly interval weights, and define a multi-criteria group decision making model which applies the type-1 ELICIT OWA operator to fuse the information. Additionally, an experimental study is introduced to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed aggregation operator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信