María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra, Vivette García-Deister, Derek Congram
{"title":"Prácticas forenses y violencia en masa: perspectivas contemporáneas y retos investigativos","authors":"María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra, Vivette García-Deister, Derek Congram","doi":"10.7440/antipoda50.2023.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": We already have forty years of experience in Latin America in the application of anthropology and forensic archaeology to the search for missing persons and investigations of gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Despite this long trajectory of very important work, the most striking protagonists of meta-analysis in the forensic work literature and its impact in recent years have not been the forensic scientists themselves, but social scientists. This article introduces the dossier “Forensic Practices and Mass Violence: Contemporary Perspectives and Research Challenges,” a work that brings together practitioners —including relatives of the missing— with academic researchers, breaking down a structural, social and artificial divide. The joining of forces between academics and practitioners better reflects the work as a whole that includes and highlights the goals concerning search, recovery, analysis, and identification, but also those concerning restitu-tion. This introduction emphasizes debates that are absent in many forensic science journals: the impact of politics on research and the political product of research, although we still have debates about questions of objectivity, neutrality, and the value of a family-driven or family-involved approach. In this dossier, we examine the adaptation and evolution of the discipline from its particular Latin American form, both in the different expressions it has taken in the region and in the way it has been expressed in the work of Latin American professionals in foreign cases such as that of the former Yugoslavia.","PeriodicalId":341210,"journal":{"name":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda50.2023.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:我们在拉丁美洲已经有四十年将人类学和法医考古学应用于寻找失踪人员和调查严重侵犯人权和国际人道主义法的行为方面的经验。尽管这是非常重要的工作的长期轨迹,但近年来法医工作文献中最引人注目的元分析主角及其影响并不是法医科学家本身,而是社会科学家。本文介绍了“法医实践和大规模暴力:当代视角和研究挑战”档案,这项工作将从业者(包括失踪人员的亲属)与学术研究人员聚集在一起,打破了结构性、社会性和人为的鸿沟。学者和从业者之间的力量结合更好地反映了工作作为一个整体,包括并突出了有关搜索、恢复、分析和鉴定的目标,但也包括有关归还的目标。这篇引言强调了许多法医学期刊中没有的争论:政治对研究的影响和研究的政治产物,尽管我们仍然有关于客观性、中立性和家庭驱动或家庭参与方法的价值的争论。在本卷宗中,我们研究了该学科从其特定的拉丁美洲形式的适应和演变,既包括它在该地区所采取的不同表达方式,也包括它在拉丁美洲专业人员在诸如前南斯拉夫等外国案件中的工作中所表达的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prácticas forenses y violencia en masa: perspectivas contemporáneas y retos investigativos
: We already have forty years of experience in Latin America in the application of anthropology and forensic archaeology to the search for missing persons and investigations of gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Despite this long trajectory of very important work, the most striking protagonists of meta-analysis in the forensic work literature and its impact in recent years have not been the forensic scientists themselves, but social scientists. This article introduces the dossier “Forensic Practices and Mass Violence: Contemporary Perspectives and Research Challenges,” a work that brings together practitioners —including relatives of the missing— with academic researchers, breaking down a structural, social and artificial divide. The joining of forces between academics and practitioners better reflects the work as a whole that includes and highlights the goals concerning search, recovery, analysis, and identification, but also those concerning restitu-tion. This introduction emphasizes debates that are absent in many forensic science journals: the impact of politics on research and the political product of research, although we still have debates about questions of objectivity, neutrality, and the value of a family-driven or family-involved approach. In this dossier, we examine the adaptation and evolution of the discipline from its particular Latin American form, both in the different expressions it has taken in the region and in the way it has been expressed in the work of Latin American professionals in foreign cases such as that of the former Yugoslavia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信