误认:政治改革还是和解?

M. Rashed
{"title":"误认:政治改革还是和解?","authors":"M. Rashed","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 “Misrecognition: Political reform or reconciliation?” interrogates two possible responses to demands for recognition. It begins by outlining the harms of misrecognition and the way in which they are social harms (i.e., collectively generated). Having identified some possible harms, the chapter asks whether misrecognition should be addressed through political reforms (bringing in considerations of human flourishing and social justice) or through cultivation of interpersonal reconciliation (bringing in attitudes and practices aimed at mutual acceptance). After examining both possibilities, it concludes with an argument for a dual perspective in which both institutional responses and the attempt to seek interpersonal reconciliation are required for addressing demands for recognition. In pursuing this, the chapter engages with key arguments by Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth, and Richard Rorty.","PeriodicalId":222338,"journal":{"name":"Madness and the demand for recognition","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misrecognition: Political reform or reconciliation?\",\"authors\":\"M. Rashed\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 5 “Misrecognition: Political reform or reconciliation?” interrogates two possible responses to demands for recognition. It begins by outlining the harms of misrecognition and the way in which they are social harms (i.e., collectively generated). Having identified some possible harms, the chapter asks whether misrecognition should be addressed through political reforms (bringing in considerations of human flourishing and social justice) or through cultivation of interpersonal reconciliation (bringing in attitudes and practices aimed at mutual acceptance). After examining both possibilities, it concludes with an argument for a dual perspective in which both institutional responses and the attempt to seek interpersonal reconciliation are required for addressing demands for recognition. In pursuing this, the chapter engages with key arguments by Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth, and Richard Rorty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Madness and the demand for recognition\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Madness and the demand for recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Madness and the demand for recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198786863.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第五章“误认:政治改革还是和解?”的问题询问了两种可能的回应。它首先概述了误认的危害以及它们对社会的危害(即集体产生的危害)。在确定了一些可能的危害之后,本章提出,是否应该通过政治改革(引入对人类繁荣和社会正义的考虑)或通过培养人际和解(引入旨在相互接受的态度和实践)来解决误解。在研究了这两种可能性之后,本文最后提出了一种双重观点,即解决承认需求需要机构反应和寻求人际和解的尝试。在探讨这个问题时,本章与南希·弗雷泽、阿克塞尔·霍尼思和理查德·罗蒂的关键论点相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misrecognition: Political reform or reconciliation?
Chapter 5 “Misrecognition: Political reform or reconciliation?” interrogates two possible responses to demands for recognition. It begins by outlining the harms of misrecognition and the way in which they are social harms (i.e., collectively generated). Having identified some possible harms, the chapter asks whether misrecognition should be addressed through political reforms (bringing in considerations of human flourishing and social justice) or through cultivation of interpersonal reconciliation (bringing in attitudes and practices aimed at mutual acceptance). After examining both possibilities, it concludes with an argument for a dual perspective in which both institutional responses and the attempt to seek interpersonal reconciliation are required for addressing demands for recognition. In pursuing this, the chapter engages with key arguments by Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth, and Richard Rorty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信