生物仿制药

V. Strand, J. Kaine, J. Isaacs
{"title":"生物仿制药","authors":"V. Strand, J. Kaine, J. Isaacs","doi":"10.1002/9781118532331.ch38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biologic therapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably over the past 20 years. Biosimilar development continues to accelerate at a frenetic pace worldwide. Initial regulatory efforts were developed within the EU and subsequent guidelines have now evolved in over 20 countries. Biosimilars by definition are highly similar, with ‘comparable quality, safety, and efficacy’ (EMA) and ‘no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency’ (FDA) to the reference product. Development and manufacturing are based on reverse engineering of the reference product as only the primary amino acid sequence is known. Testing of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure, binding pharmacokinetics, and stability is required. Characterization of post-translational modifications and biologic function, pharmacokinetics, evaluation of immunogenicity, and at least one comparative efficacy clinical trial are major requirements for regulatory approval. Clinical trials to assess biosimilarity are required in only one clinical indication and may be extrapolated to other indications for which the reference product is approved. Both single and multiple switching trials (between biosimilar and reference product) have yielded consistent results across numerous patient populations and diseases, with no evidence of detrimental outcomes. Two prospective large observational series (Danbio and Nor-Switch) have similarly assessed non-medical switching. Several open-label switching studies have revealed equivalent efficacy, safety, and discontinuation rates but real-world studies have raised concerns about potential nocebo responses.","PeriodicalId":135409,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Rheumatoid Arthritis","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biosimilars\",\"authors\":\"V. Strand, J. Kaine, J. Isaacs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781118532331.ch38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biologic therapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably over the past 20 years. Biosimilar development continues to accelerate at a frenetic pace worldwide. Initial regulatory efforts were developed within the EU and subsequent guidelines have now evolved in over 20 countries. Biosimilars by definition are highly similar, with ‘comparable quality, safety, and efficacy’ (EMA) and ‘no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency’ (FDA) to the reference product. Development and manufacturing are based on reverse engineering of the reference product as only the primary amino acid sequence is known. Testing of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure, binding pharmacokinetics, and stability is required. Characterization of post-translational modifications and biologic function, pharmacokinetics, evaluation of immunogenicity, and at least one comparative efficacy clinical trial are major requirements for regulatory approval. Clinical trials to assess biosimilarity are required in only one clinical indication and may be extrapolated to other indications for which the reference product is approved. Both single and multiple switching trials (between biosimilar and reference product) have yielded consistent results across numerous patient populations and diseases, with no evidence of detrimental outcomes. Two prospective large observational series (Danbio and Nor-Switch) have similarly assessed non-medical switching. Several open-label switching studies have revealed equivalent efficacy, safety, and discontinuation rates but real-world studies have raised concerns about potential nocebo responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Textbook of Rheumatoid Arthritis\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Textbook of Rheumatoid Arthritis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118532331.ch38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Rheumatoid Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118532331.ch38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物疗法治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)在过去的20年里有了很大的发展。生物仿制药的开发在世界范围内继续以疯狂的速度加速。最初的监管努力是在欧盟内部制定的,随后的指导方针现已在20多个国家发展。生物仿制药的定义是高度相似的,具有“相当的质量、安全性和有效性”(EMA),并且“在安全性、纯度和效力方面没有临床意义的差异”(FDA)。由于只有一级氨基酸序列是已知的,因此开发和制造是基于对参考产品的逆向工程。需要进行一级、二级、三级和四级结构、结合药代动力学和稳定性测试。翻译后修饰和生物学功能的表征、药代动力学、免疫原性评估以及至少一项比较疗效的临床试验是获得监管部门批准的主要要求。评估生物相似性的临床试验只需要在一种临床适应症中进行,并且可以推断出参考产品被批准的其他适应症。单次和多次转换试验(在生物仿制药和参比产品之间)在众多患者群体和疾病中都产生了一致的结果,没有证据表明会产生有害后果。两个前瞻性大型观察系列(Danbio和Nor-Switch)对非医疗转换进行了类似的评估。几项开放标签转换研究显示了相同的疗效、安全性和停药率,但现实世界的研究引起了对反安慰剂潜在反应的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biosimilars
Biologic therapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably over the past 20 years. Biosimilar development continues to accelerate at a frenetic pace worldwide. Initial regulatory efforts were developed within the EU and subsequent guidelines have now evolved in over 20 countries. Biosimilars by definition are highly similar, with ‘comparable quality, safety, and efficacy’ (EMA) and ‘no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency’ (FDA) to the reference product. Development and manufacturing are based on reverse engineering of the reference product as only the primary amino acid sequence is known. Testing of primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure, binding pharmacokinetics, and stability is required. Characterization of post-translational modifications and biologic function, pharmacokinetics, evaluation of immunogenicity, and at least one comparative efficacy clinical trial are major requirements for regulatory approval. Clinical trials to assess biosimilarity are required in only one clinical indication and may be extrapolated to other indications for which the reference product is approved. Both single and multiple switching trials (between biosimilar and reference product) have yielded consistent results across numerous patient populations and diseases, with no evidence of detrimental outcomes. Two prospective large observational series (Danbio and Nor-Switch) have similarly assessed non-medical switching. Several open-label switching studies have revealed equivalent efficacy, safety, and discontinuation rates but real-world studies have raised concerns about potential nocebo responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信