{"title":"小波滤波器在音频压缩中的选择","authors":"P. Philippe, F. M. D. Saint-Martin, L. Mainard","doi":"10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the issue of choosing an optimal wavelet packets transform for audio compression. We present a comparison method based on a perceptual approach, which provides an entropic bit-rate for \"transparent\" coding of a given audio signal. The test with different wavelets leads to the conclusion that the most significant synthesis criterion for audio compression is the so-called \"coding gain\", while frequency selectivity, regularity and orthogonality seem less relevant.","PeriodicalId":300119,"journal":{"name":"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the choice of wavelet filters for audio compression\",\"authors\":\"P. Philippe, F. M. D. Saint-Martin, L. Mainard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We address the issue of choosing an optimal wavelet packets transform for audio compression. We present a comparison method based on a perceptual approach, which provides an entropic bit-rate for \\\"transparent\\\" coding of a given audio signal. The test with different wavelets leads to the conclusion that the most significant synthesis criterion for audio compression is the so-called \\\"coding gain\\\", while frequency selectivity, regularity and orthogonality seem less relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the choice of wavelet filters for audio compression
We address the issue of choosing an optimal wavelet packets transform for audio compression. We present a comparison method based on a perceptual approach, which provides an entropic bit-rate for "transparent" coding of a given audio signal. The test with different wavelets leads to the conclusion that the most significant synthesis criterion for audio compression is the so-called "coding gain", while frequency selectivity, regularity and orthogonality seem less relevant.