塞浦路斯问题和围起来的瓦罗沙:对迄今判决的分析

M. Erdem
{"title":"塞浦路斯问题和围起来的瓦罗沙:对迄今判决的分析","authors":"M. Erdem","doi":"10.30915/abd.1145674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negotiations continuing for more than forty-five years under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) in resolving Cyprus problem have to date ended without agreement. The property dispute has been one of the aspects of the problem. The Immovable Property Commission (IPC) established in the north to examine claims of Greek Cypriots who abandoned their properties has been a development in this regard. In this respect, the properties remaining in the fenced-off area of Varosha deserve a separate analysis. \nThe area has been a military zone since the Turkish military intervention of 1974. The UN Security Council Resolutions 550 (1984) and 789 (1992) state that it should be transferred to the administration of the United Nations for resettlement of its inhabitants. Following the Turkish initiative in 2020 to demilitarize and open the area up for its original inhabitants, the political implications of this move have been subject of various discussions. \nHowever, this article attempts to shed light upon upon the domestic decisions and judgments in relation to properties remaining in this area and the implications these might have on the Greek Cypriots property rights. The question is whether and how, the initiative by the Turkish authorities on one hand, and the approach by the IPC on the other hand could impact the prospect of Greek Cypriot claims before the European Court of Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":231622,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Barosu Dergisi","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CYPRUS PROBLEM AND THE FENCED-OFF VAROSHA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENTS TO DATE\",\"authors\":\"M. Erdem\",\"doi\":\"10.30915/abd.1145674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Negotiations continuing for more than forty-five years under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) in resolving Cyprus problem have to date ended without agreement. The property dispute has been one of the aspects of the problem. The Immovable Property Commission (IPC) established in the north to examine claims of Greek Cypriots who abandoned their properties has been a development in this regard. In this respect, the properties remaining in the fenced-off area of Varosha deserve a separate analysis. \\nThe area has been a military zone since the Turkish military intervention of 1974. The UN Security Council Resolutions 550 (1984) and 789 (1992) state that it should be transferred to the administration of the United Nations for resettlement of its inhabitants. Following the Turkish initiative in 2020 to demilitarize and open the area up for its original inhabitants, the political implications of this move have been subject of various discussions. \\nHowever, this article attempts to shed light upon upon the domestic decisions and judgments in relation to properties remaining in this area and the implications these might have on the Greek Cypriots property rights. The question is whether and how, the initiative by the Turkish authorities on one hand, and the approach by the IPC on the other hand could impact the prospect of Greek Cypriot claims before the European Court of Human Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ankara Barosu Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ankara Barosu Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1145674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Barosu Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1145674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在联合国的主持下,为解决塞浦路斯问题进行了45年多的谈判,但迄今仍未达成协议。财产纠纷一直是问题的一个方面。在北部设立的不动产委员会(IPC)是在这方面的一个发展,目的是审查放弃其财产的希族塞人的索赔要求。在这方面,瓦罗沙围区内遗留的财产值得单独分析。自1974年土耳其军事干预以来,该地区一直是一个军事区。联合国安理会第550(1984)号和第789(1992)号决议规定,该领土应移交联合国管理,以便重新安置其居民。在土耳其于2020年主动提出非军事化并向其原始居民开放该地区之后,这一举动的政治影响一直是各种讨论的主题。但是,本文试图阐明有关这一地区剩余财产的国内决定和判断,以及这些决定和判断可能对希族塞人的财产权产生的影响。问题是,土耳其当局的倡议和IPC的做法是否以及如何影响希族塞人向欧洲人权法院提出索赔的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CYPRUS PROBLEM AND THE FENCED-OFF VAROSHA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENTS TO DATE
Negotiations continuing for more than forty-five years under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) in resolving Cyprus problem have to date ended without agreement. The property dispute has been one of the aspects of the problem. The Immovable Property Commission (IPC) established in the north to examine claims of Greek Cypriots who abandoned their properties has been a development in this regard. In this respect, the properties remaining in the fenced-off area of Varosha deserve a separate analysis. The area has been a military zone since the Turkish military intervention of 1974. The UN Security Council Resolutions 550 (1984) and 789 (1992) state that it should be transferred to the administration of the United Nations for resettlement of its inhabitants. Following the Turkish initiative in 2020 to demilitarize and open the area up for its original inhabitants, the political implications of this move have been subject of various discussions. However, this article attempts to shed light upon upon the domestic decisions and judgments in relation to properties remaining in this area and the implications these might have on the Greek Cypriots property rights. The question is whether and how, the initiative by the Turkish authorities on one hand, and the approach by the IPC on the other hand could impact the prospect of Greek Cypriot claims before the European Court of Human Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信