Xiaoying Pu, M. Kay, S. Drucker, Jeffrey Heer, Dominik Moritz, Arvind Satyanarayan
{"title":"可视化语法特别兴趣小组","authors":"Xiaoying Pu, M. Kay, S. Drucker, Jeffrey Heer, Dominik Moritz, Arvind Satyanarayan","doi":"10.1145/3411763.3450406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visualization grammars, often based on the Grammar of Graphics, are popular choices for specifying expressive visualizations and supporting visualization systems. However, there are still open questions about grammar design and evaluation not well-answered in visualization research. In this SIG, we propose to discuss what makes a grammar “good” and explore evaluation methodologies best suited for visualization grammars.","PeriodicalId":265192,"journal":{"name":"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Interest Group on Visualization Grammars\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoying Pu, M. Kay, S. Drucker, Jeffrey Heer, Dominik Moritz, Arvind Satyanarayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3411763.3450406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Visualization grammars, often based on the Grammar of Graphics, are popular choices for specifying expressive visualizations and supporting visualization systems. However, there are still open questions about grammar design and evaluation not well-answered in visualization research. In this SIG, we propose to discuss what makes a grammar “good” and explore evaluation methodologies best suited for visualization grammars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visualization grammars, often based on the Grammar of Graphics, are popular choices for specifying expressive visualizations and supporting visualization systems. However, there are still open questions about grammar design and evaluation not well-answered in visualization research. In this SIG, we propose to discuss what makes a grammar “good” and explore evaluation methodologies best suited for visualization grammars.