学生谘询策略是改善学校的杠杆。合作研究的结果/学生咨询策略作为学校改善的杠杆。合作研究的结果

Noelia Ceballos-López, Adelina Calvo-Salvador, Ignacio Haya-Salmón
{"title":"学生谘询策略是改善学校的杠杆。合作研究的结果/学生咨询策略作为学校改善的杠杆。合作研究的结果","authors":"Noelia Ceballos-López, Adelina Calvo-Salvador, Ignacio Haya-Salmón","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents the results of a study carried out in nine schools in Cantabria (Spain) over a five-year period under the Student Voice philosophy. Experiences are described in early childhood and primary and secondary education, as well as in ‘second chance contexts’. The study has been carried out within a qualitative-collaborative framework using ethnographic data collection techniques (semi-structured interviews, participant observations and images). The analysis was conducted using a system of categories and codes compiled according to inductive and deductive processes with the MAXQDA qualitative analysis program. Specifically, the Student Consultation Phase carried out in all the schools is analysed in order to ensure that all students participate and are heard, including those who have tended to have greater difficulties or less presence in school. A review is carried out of the consultation strategies used, the means of communication (languages) and the issues that have been the focus of dialogue and improvements: curricular developments, coexistence, the design of spaces and classroom management. We conclude that reflection on curricular matters tends to be scarce, and that adults still have a significant presence in the management of the dialogue process, which needs to be directed more by children and young people.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student consultation strategies as a lever for school improvement. Results of a collaborative study / Estrategias de consulta al alumnado como palanca para la mejora escolar. Resultados de una investigación colaborativa\",\"authors\":\"Noelia Ceballos-López, Adelina Calvo-Salvador, Ignacio Haya-Salmón\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article presents the results of a study carried out in nine schools in Cantabria (Spain) over a five-year period under the Student Voice philosophy. Experiences are described in early childhood and primary and secondary education, as well as in ‘second chance contexts’. The study has been carried out within a qualitative-collaborative framework using ethnographic data collection techniques (semi-structured interviews, participant observations and images). The analysis was conducted using a system of categories and codes compiled according to inductive and deductive processes with the MAXQDA qualitative analysis program. Specifically, the Student Consultation Phase carried out in all the schools is analysed in order to ensure that all students participate and are heard, including those who have tended to have greater difficulties or less presence in school. A review is carried out of the consultation strategies used, the means of communication (languages) and the issues that have been the focus of dialogue and improvements: curricular developments, coexistence, the design of spaces and classroom management. We conclude that reflection on curricular matters tends to be scarce, and that adults still have a significant presence in the management of the dialogue process, which needs to be directed more by children and young people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了在坎塔布里亚(西班牙)的九所学校进行的一项为期五年的学生之声哲学研究的结果。在儿童早期、小学和中学教育以及“第二次机会环境”中描述经验。这项研究是在定性合作框架内进行的,使用了民族志数据收集技术(半结构化访谈、参与者观察和图像)。采用MAXQDA定性分析程序,根据归纳和演绎过程编制的分类和代码系统进行分析。具体而言,在所有学校进行的学生咨询阶段进行了分析,以确保所有学生参与并听取意见,包括那些往往有较大困难或较少出现在学校的学生。对所使用的协商战略、交流手段(语言)以及一直是对话和改进重点的问题进行了审查:课程发展、共存、空间设计和教室管理。我们的结论是,对课程问题的反思往往很少,成年人在对话进程的管理中仍然发挥着重要作用,对话进程需要更多地由儿童和年轻人来指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student consultation strategies as a lever for school improvement. Results of a collaborative study / Estrategias de consulta al alumnado como palanca para la mejora escolar. Resultados de una investigación colaborativa
Abstract This article presents the results of a study carried out in nine schools in Cantabria (Spain) over a five-year period under the Student Voice philosophy. Experiences are described in early childhood and primary and secondary education, as well as in ‘second chance contexts’. The study has been carried out within a qualitative-collaborative framework using ethnographic data collection techniques (semi-structured interviews, participant observations and images). The analysis was conducted using a system of categories and codes compiled according to inductive and deductive processes with the MAXQDA qualitative analysis program. Specifically, the Student Consultation Phase carried out in all the schools is analysed in order to ensure that all students participate and are heard, including those who have tended to have greater difficulties or less presence in school. A review is carried out of the consultation strategies used, the means of communication (languages) and the issues that have been the focus of dialogue and improvements: curricular developments, coexistence, the design of spaces and classroom management. We conclude that reflection on curricular matters tends to be scarce, and that adults still have a significant presence in the management of the dialogue process, which needs to be directed more by children and young people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信