当欧洲人感到困惑是合理的:从比较的角度理解何时残疾住宿是“合理的”

L. Waddington
{"title":"当欧洲人感到困惑是合理的:从比较的角度理解何时残疾住宿是“合理的”","authors":"L. Waddington","doi":"10.4324/9781315094861-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the meaning of the concept reasonable accommodation for persons with a disability from a European perspective. The requirement to provide for such accommodations flows from Article 5 of the EC Employment Equality Directive (2000/78). In spite of this common origin, the article notes that that EC Member States have transposed and interpreted the obligation in a variety of different ways, and no common understanding of, in particular, the notion of reasonableness with regard to an accommodation, exists. Instead, the article identifies three different ways in which the term reasonable has been understood. In the first approach, an accommodation will only be regarded as reasonable if it does not impose excessive difficulties or costs on the employer or other covered party. According to the second approach, an accommodation will be regarded as reasonable if it is effective in allowing the relevant individual to carry out the necessary (employment related) tasks. The last way is which the term reasonable is used in legislation is to convey both that the accommodation must be effective and that it must not impose significant inconvenience or cost on the employer or covered party. Given that this approach also seems to be adopted in Article 5 of the Employment Equality Directive, the European Court of Justice will be confronted with the task of interpreting, and thereby enabling national courts to apply, this dual meaning in the future.","PeriodicalId":315561,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When it is Reasonable for Europeans to Be Confused: Understanding When a Disability Accommodation is 'Reasonable' from a Comparative Perspective\",\"authors\":\"L. Waddington\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315094861-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the meaning of the concept reasonable accommodation for persons with a disability from a European perspective. The requirement to provide for such accommodations flows from Article 5 of the EC Employment Equality Directive (2000/78). In spite of this common origin, the article notes that that EC Member States have transposed and interpreted the obligation in a variety of different ways, and no common understanding of, in particular, the notion of reasonableness with regard to an accommodation, exists. Instead, the article identifies three different ways in which the term reasonable has been understood. In the first approach, an accommodation will only be regarded as reasonable if it does not impose excessive difficulties or costs on the employer or other covered party. According to the second approach, an accommodation will be regarded as reasonable if it is effective in allowing the relevant individual to carry out the necessary (employment related) tasks. The last way is which the term reasonable is used in legislation is to convey both that the accommodation must be effective and that it must not impose significant inconvenience or cost on the employer or covered party. Given that this approach also seems to be adopted in Article 5 of the Employment Equality Directive, the European Court of Justice will be confronted with the task of interpreting, and thereby enabling national courts to apply, this dual meaning in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094861-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094861-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文从欧洲的角度探讨了对残疾人的合理便利这一概念的含义。提供这种便利的要求来自欧共体就业平等指令(2000/78)第5条。尽管有这种共同的起源,该条指出,欧共体成员国以各种不同的方式改变和解释了这项义务,特别是对通便的合理性概念没有共同的理解。相反,本文确定了理解“合理”一词的三种不同方式。在第一种方法中,只有在不给雇主或其他受保方带来过多困难或费用的情况下,一种便利才会被视为合理。根据第二种方法,如果一项便利有效地允许有关个人执行必要的(与就业有关的)任务,则该便利将被视为合理。在立法中使用“合理”一词的最后一种方式是,既要传达便利必须有效,又不能给雇主或受保方造成重大不便或费用。鉴于《就业平等指令》第5条似乎也采用了这种做法,欧洲法院将面临解释这种双重含义的任务,从而使各国法院能够在将来适用这种双重含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When it is Reasonable for Europeans to Be Confused: Understanding When a Disability Accommodation is 'Reasonable' from a Comparative Perspective
The article discusses the meaning of the concept reasonable accommodation for persons with a disability from a European perspective. The requirement to provide for such accommodations flows from Article 5 of the EC Employment Equality Directive (2000/78). In spite of this common origin, the article notes that that EC Member States have transposed and interpreted the obligation in a variety of different ways, and no common understanding of, in particular, the notion of reasonableness with regard to an accommodation, exists. Instead, the article identifies three different ways in which the term reasonable has been understood. In the first approach, an accommodation will only be regarded as reasonable if it does not impose excessive difficulties or costs on the employer or other covered party. According to the second approach, an accommodation will be regarded as reasonable if it is effective in allowing the relevant individual to carry out the necessary (employment related) tasks. The last way is which the term reasonable is used in legislation is to convey both that the accommodation must be effective and that it must not impose significant inconvenience or cost on the employer or covered party. Given that this approach also seems to be adopted in Article 5 of the Employment Equality Directive, the European Court of Justice will be confronted with the task of interpreting, and thereby enabling national courts to apply, this dual meaning in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信