无线传感器网络节能跨层协议设计的MAC层协议选择机制

S. Arockiaraj, H. Hebbar, K. Makkithaya
{"title":"无线传感器网络节能跨层协议设计的MAC层协议选择机制","authors":"S. Arockiaraj, H. Hebbar, K. Makkithaya","doi":"10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are the interconnected, large quantity of tiny wireless sensor nodes, deployed for specific monitoring and control purposes. It is hard and expensive to change or recharge the nodes, after deployment in harsh environments. Therefore, it is necessary for the efficient utilization of the energy of the available power in the tiny-sized battery of the sensors to extend the lifespan of the WSNs. To increase the lifespan, there are many protocols proposed in the literature that combines the Media Access Control (MAC) layer to the Network Layer (NL) for the cross layer design (CLD). The transceiver operations at the MAC layer cause most energy consumption, therefore, identifying a suitable MAC protocol for the cross layer scheme is more significant. In this connection, this paper proposes a mechanism to identify a suitable MAC protocol to be used with the NL protocol for the CLD. The simulations were conducted to compare the performance of the B-MAC, X-MAC, L-MAC, and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocols using the OMNET++ tool. The performance of the protocols is evaluated in terms of energy consumption (EC), end-to-end delay (EED), and packets delivery count (PDC). The observation of the results shows that the IEEE 802.15.4 Carrier Sense Multiple Access/ Collision Avoidance (CSMA/ CA) based transmission scheme is more efficient in terms of energy, delay, and PDC. This protocol consumes at least 2.1 times less energy than other MAC protocols and improves the PDC by at least 1.97 times more than other MAC protocols and reduces the end-to-end delay by at least 35.5ms when compared to other MAC protocols.","PeriodicalId":436488,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MAC Layer Protocol Selection Mechanism for the Energy Efficient Cross Layer Protocol Design of Wireless Sensor Network\",\"authors\":\"S. Arockiaraj, H. Hebbar, K. Makkithaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are the interconnected, large quantity of tiny wireless sensor nodes, deployed for specific monitoring and control purposes. It is hard and expensive to change or recharge the nodes, after deployment in harsh environments. Therefore, it is necessary for the efficient utilization of the energy of the available power in the tiny-sized battery of the sensors to extend the lifespan of the WSNs. To increase the lifespan, there are many protocols proposed in the literature that combines the Media Access Control (MAC) layer to the Network Layer (NL) for the cross layer design (CLD). The transceiver operations at the MAC layer cause most energy consumption, therefore, identifying a suitable MAC protocol for the cross layer scheme is more significant. In this connection, this paper proposes a mechanism to identify a suitable MAC protocol to be used with the NL protocol for the CLD. The simulations were conducted to compare the performance of the B-MAC, X-MAC, L-MAC, and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocols using the OMNET++ tool. The performance of the protocols is evaluated in terms of energy consumption (EC), end-to-end delay (EED), and packets delivery count (PDC). The observation of the results shows that the IEEE 802.15.4 Carrier Sense Multiple Access/ Collision Avoidance (CSMA/ CA) based transmission scheme is more efficient in terms of energy, delay, and PDC. This protocol consumes at least 2.1 times less energy than other MAC protocols and improves the PDC by at least 1.97 times more than other MAC protocols and reduces the end-to-end delay by at least 35.5ms when compared to other MAC protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

无线传感器网络(wsn)是由相互连接的大量微型无线传感器节点组成的网络,用于特定的监测和控制目的。在恶劣的环境中部署后,对节点进行更改或充电是困难且昂贵的。因此,有效利用传感器电池中可用功率的能量是延长无线传感器网络寿命的必要条件。为了延长使用寿命,文献中提出了许多将媒体访问控制(MAC)层与网络层(NL)相结合进行跨层设计(CLD)的协议。在MAC层的收发器操作会造成大部分的能量消耗,因此,为跨层方案确定一个合适的MAC协议是非常重要的。在这方面,本文提出了一种机制,以确定一个合适的MAC协议,以与NL协议一起用于CLD。利用omnet++工具对B-MAC、X-MAC、L-MAC和IEEE 802.15.4 MAC协议的性能进行了仿真比较。主要从能耗(EC)、端到端延迟(EED)和包交付计数(PDC)三个方面对协议的性能进行评价。实验结果表明,基于IEEE 802.15.4载波感知多址/避免碰撞(CSMA/ CA)的传输方案在能量、延迟和PDC方面具有更高的效率。与其他MAC协议相比,该协议能耗至少降低2.1倍,PDC效率至少提高1.97倍,端到端时延至少降低35.5ms。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MAC Layer Protocol Selection Mechanism for the Energy Efficient Cross Layer Protocol Design of Wireless Sensor Network
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are the interconnected, large quantity of tiny wireless sensor nodes, deployed for specific monitoring and control purposes. It is hard and expensive to change or recharge the nodes, after deployment in harsh environments. Therefore, it is necessary for the efficient utilization of the energy of the available power in the tiny-sized battery of the sensors to extend the lifespan of the WSNs. To increase the lifespan, there are many protocols proposed in the literature that combines the Media Access Control (MAC) layer to the Network Layer (NL) for the cross layer design (CLD). The transceiver operations at the MAC layer cause most energy consumption, therefore, identifying a suitable MAC protocol for the cross layer scheme is more significant. In this connection, this paper proposes a mechanism to identify a suitable MAC protocol to be used with the NL protocol for the CLD. The simulations were conducted to compare the performance of the B-MAC, X-MAC, L-MAC, and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocols using the OMNET++ tool. The performance of the protocols is evaluated in terms of energy consumption (EC), end-to-end delay (EED), and packets delivery count (PDC). The observation of the results shows that the IEEE 802.15.4 Carrier Sense Multiple Access/ Collision Avoidance (CSMA/ CA) based transmission scheme is more efficient in terms of energy, delay, and PDC. This protocol consumes at least 2.1 times less energy than other MAC protocols and improves the PDC by at least 1.97 times more than other MAC protocols and reduces the end-to-end delay by at least 35.5ms when compared to other MAC protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信