获取协同设计的几何原理

M. Klein
{"title":"获取协同设计的几何原理","authors":"M. Klein","doi":"10.1109/ENABL.1997.630785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When an artifact is designed, the typical output consists of documents describing the final result of a long series of deliberations and tradeoffs by the participants of collaborative design (a.k.a. concurrent engineering) teams. The underlying intent and logical support (i.e. the rationale) for the decisions captured therein is usually lost, or is represented at best as a scattered, difficult-to-access collection of paper documents and designers' recollections. This is particularly true for a geometric, as opposed to a preliminary, design rationale. Rationale information is critical, however, for important collaborative design functions such as team memory, design retrieval and negotiation. This paper describes an evolving Web-based tool designed to greatly improve the capture and access of preliminary and geometric design rationale in concurrent engineering teams, based on a marriage of rationale capture, the World Wide Web, CAD and feature-based design technology.","PeriodicalId":334410,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE 6th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing geometry rationale for collaborative design\",\"authors\":\"M. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ENABL.1997.630785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When an artifact is designed, the typical output consists of documents describing the final result of a long series of deliberations and tradeoffs by the participants of collaborative design (a.k.a. concurrent engineering) teams. The underlying intent and logical support (i.e. the rationale) for the decisions captured therein is usually lost, or is represented at best as a scattered, difficult-to-access collection of paper documents and designers' recollections. This is particularly true for a geometric, as opposed to a preliminary, design rationale. Rationale information is critical, however, for important collaborative design functions such as team memory, design retrieval and negotiation. This paper describes an evolving Web-based tool designed to greatly improve the capture and access of preliminary and geometric design rationale in concurrent engineering teams, based on a marriage of rationale capture, the World Wide Web, CAD and feature-based design technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE 6th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE 6th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.1997.630785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE 6th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.1997.630785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

当设计一个工件时,典型的输出由描述协作设计(又名并行工程)团队参与者的一系列商议和权衡的最终结果的文档组成。其中所捕获的决策的潜在意图和逻辑支持(即基本原理)通常会丢失,或者充其量只是零散的、难以访问的纸质文档和设计师回忆的集合。这对于几何的设计原理来说尤其如此,而不是初步的设计原理。然而,基本原理信息对于重要的协作设计功能(如团队记忆、设计检索和协商)是至关重要的。本文描述了一个不断发展的基于Web的工具,该工具基于基本原理捕获、万维网、CAD和基于特征的设计技术的结合,旨在极大地改善并行工程团队对初步和几何设计原理的捕获和访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capturing geometry rationale for collaborative design
When an artifact is designed, the typical output consists of documents describing the final result of a long series of deliberations and tradeoffs by the participants of collaborative design (a.k.a. concurrent engineering) teams. The underlying intent and logical support (i.e. the rationale) for the decisions captured therein is usually lost, or is represented at best as a scattered, difficult-to-access collection of paper documents and designers' recollections. This is particularly true for a geometric, as opposed to a preliminary, design rationale. Rationale information is critical, however, for important collaborative design functions such as team memory, design retrieval and negotiation. This paper describes an evolving Web-based tool designed to greatly improve the capture and access of preliminary and geometric design rationale in concurrent engineering teams, based on a marriage of rationale capture, the World Wide Web, CAD and feature-based design technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信