基于人工智能的移动人群感知异常与数据姿态分类

Aysha K. Alharam, H. Otrok, W. Elmedany, Ahsan Baidar Bakht, Nouf Alkaabi
{"title":"基于人工智能的移动人群感知异常与数据姿态分类","authors":"Aysha K. Alharam, H. Otrok, W. Elmedany, Ahsan Baidar Bakht, Nouf Alkaabi","doi":"10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9581443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, Mobile Crowd Sensing (MCS) became the popular paradigm for sensing data. MCS is vulnerable to many types of threats and faces many challenges. Trustworthiness is one of the main MCS challenges; attackers aim to inject faulty data to corrupt the system or waste its resources. Thus, MCS organizers must ensure that no malicious users are contributing to have trusted sensed data. Faulty sensor readings in MCS can be due to sensor failure or malicious behavior. Attackers targets degrade the system performance and reduce the worker's reputation by injecting false data. This paper evaluates different machine learning algorithms classifying the received sensed data as true, a faulty sensor, or attacker behavior. These algorithms are Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Frost (RF). Evaluating the result for comparison obtained based on accuracy, precision, Recall, f1 score, and the confusion matrix. The result shows that among all classifiers, RF shows the highest accuracy of 97.9%.","PeriodicalId":133021,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-Based Anomaly and Data Posing Classification in Mobile Crowd Sensing\",\"authors\":\"Aysha K. Alharam, H. Otrok, W. Elmedany, Ahsan Baidar Bakht, Nouf Alkaabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9581443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, Mobile Crowd Sensing (MCS) became the popular paradigm for sensing data. MCS is vulnerable to many types of threats and faces many challenges. Trustworthiness is one of the main MCS challenges; attackers aim to inject faulty data to corrupt the system or waste its resources. Thus, MCS organizers must ensure that no malicious users are contributing to have trusted sensed data. Faulty sensor readings in MCS can be due to sensor failure or malicious behavior. Attackers targets degrade the system performance and reduce the worker's reputation by injecting false data. This paper evaluates different machine learning algorithms classifying the received sensed data as true, a faulty sensor, or attacker behavior. These algorithms are Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Frost (RF). Evaluating the result for comparison obtained based on accuracy, precision, Recall, f1 score, and the confusion matrix. The result shows that among all classifiers, RF shows the highest accuracy of 97.9%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9581443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9581443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,移动人群传感(MCS)已成为传感数据的流行范式。MCS易受多种威胁,面临诸多挑战。诚信是MCS面临的主要挑战之一;攻击者的目标是注入错误的数据来破坏系统或浪费其资源。因此,MCS组织者必须确保没有恶意用户提供可信的感测数据。MCS中的传感器读数错误可能是由于传感器故障或恶意行为。攻击者通过注入虚假数据来降低系统性能,降低工作者的信誉。本文评估了不同的机器学习算法,将接收到的感测数据分类为真实,故障传感器或攻击者行为。这些算法是决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机霜(RF)。评估基于准确度、精密度、召回率、f1分数和混淆矩阵获得的比较结果。结果表明,在所有分类器中,射频分类器的准确率最高,达到97.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-Based Anomaly and Data Posing Classification in Mobile Crowd Sensing
Nowadays, Mobile Crowd Sensing (MCS) became the popular paradigm for sensing data. MCS is vulnerable to many types of threats and faces many challenges. Trustworthiness is one of the main MCS challenges; attackers aim to inject faulty data to corrupt the system or waste its resources. Thus, MCS organizers must ensure that no malicious users are contributing to have trusted sensed data. Faulty sensor readings in MCS can be due to sensor failure or malicious behavior. Attackers targets degrade the system performance and reduce the worker's reputation by injecting false data. This paper evaluates different machine learning algorithms classifying the received sensed data as true, a faulty sensor, or attacker behavior. These algorithms are Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Frost (RF). Evaluating the result for comparison obtained based on accuracy, precision, Recall, f1 score, and the confusion matrix. The result shows that among all classifiers, RF shows the highest accuracy of 97.9%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信