{"title":"关于历史-法律研究的数字化。关于约翰-B.南纳和莫里斯-L-科恩的《耶鲁法学院美国法律史研究指南》。纽黑文-伦敦：耶鲁大学出版社，2018 年，第 349 页","authors":"Łukasz Jan Korporowicz","doi":"10.4467/20844131ks.21.012.13529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the Digitization of Historical and Legal Research: A Few Remarks in the Margin of John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen’s Book The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History. New Haven–London: Yale University Press, 2018, 349 Pages\n\nThe review deals with a recently published book authored by John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen and titled “The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History”. The modern, digital inclusive, approach to research in legal history presented by the book’s authors, provides a basis for the further comments gathered in the review. The review aims to convince Polish scholars to create a similar tool for young acolytes of legal history.","PeriodicalId":346009,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O cyfryzacji badań historycznoprawnych. Kilka uwag na marginesie książki Johna B. Nanna i Morrisa L. Cohena pt. The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History. New Haven–London: Yale University Press, 2018, stron 349\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Jan Korporowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/20844131ks.21.012.13529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the Digitization of Historical and Legal Research: A Few Remarks in the Margin of John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen’s Book The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History. New Haven–London: Yale University Press, 2018, 349 Pages\\n\\nThe review deals with a recently published book authored by John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen and titled “The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History”. The modern, digital inclusive, approach to research in legal history presented by the book’s authors, provides a basis for the further comments gathered in the review. The review aims to convince Polish scholars to create a similar tool for young acolytes of legal history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131ks.21.012.13529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131ks.21.012.13529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
O cyfryzacji badań historycznoprawnych. Kilka uwag na marginesie książki Johna B. Nanna i Morrisa L. Cohena pt. The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History. New Haven–London: Yale University Press, 2018, stron 349
On the Digitization of Historical and Legal Research: A Few Remarks in the Margin of John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen’s Book The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History. New Haven–London: Yale University Press, 2018, 349 Pages
The review deals with a recently published book authored by John B. Nann and Morris L. Cohen and titled “The Yale Law School Guide to Research in American Legal History”. The modern, digital inclusive, approach to research in legal history presented by the book’s authors, provides a basis for the further comments gathered in the review. The review aims to convince Polish scholars to create a similar tool for young acolytes of legal history.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
