{"title":"4K自动立体显示器三维传输格式的比较研究","authors":"Lucia Grimaldi, Matthias Wegener, Arion Neddens, Klaas Schüür","doi":"10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.","PeriodicalId":111565,"journal":{"name":"2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Grimaldi, Matthias Wegener, Arion Neddens, Klaas Schüür\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays
In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.