将粗糙集理论与人工免疫识别系统相结合,降低入侵检测系统的虚警率

Fatin Norsyafawati Mohd Sabri, N. Norwawi, K. Seman
{"title":"将粗糙集理论与人工免疫识别系统相结合,降低入侵检测系统的虚警率","authors":"Fatin Norsyafawati Mohd Sabri, N. Norwawi, K. Seman","doi":"10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Denial of Service (DoS) attacks is one of the security threats for computer systems and applications. It usually make use of software bugs to crash or freeze a service or network resource or bandwidth limits by making use of a flood attack to saturate all bandwidth. Predicting a potential DOS attacks would be very helpful for an IT departments or managements to optimize the security of intrusion detection system (IDS). Nowadays, false alarm rates and accuracy become the main subject to be addressed in measuring the effectiveness of IDS. Thus, the purpose of this work is to search the classifier that is capable to reduce the false alarm rates and increase the accuracy of the detection system. This study applied Artificial Immune System (AIS) in IDS. However, this study has been improved by using integration of rough set theory (RST) with Artificial Immune Recognition System 1 (AIRS1) algorithm, (Rough-AIRS1) to categorize the DoS samples. RST is expected to be able to reduce the redundant features from huge amount of data that is capable to increase the performance of the classification. Furthermore, AIS is an incremental learning approach that will minimize duplications of cases in a knowledge based. It will be efficient in terms of memory storage and searching for similarities in Intrusion Detection (IDS) attacks patterns. This study use NSL-KDD 20% train dataset to test the classifiers. Then, the performances are compared with single AIRS1 and J48 algorithm. Results from these experiments show that Rough-AIRS1 has lower number of false alarm rate compared to single AIRS but a little bit higher than J48. However, accuracy for this hybrid technique is slightly lower compared to others.","PeriodicalId":139268,"journal":{"name":"2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)","volume":"97 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid of rough set theory and Artificial Immune Recognition System as a solution to decrease false alarm rate in intrusion detection system\",\"authors\":\"Fatin Norsyafawati Mohd Sabri, N. Norwawi, K. Seman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Denial of Service (DoS) attacks is one of the security threats for computer systems and applications. It usually make use of software bugs to crash or freeze a service or network resource or bandwidth limits by making use of a flood attack to saturate all bandwidth. Predicting a potential DOS attacks would be very helpful for an IT departments or managements to optimize the security of intrusion detection system (IDS). Nowadays, false alarm rates and accuracy become the main subject to be addressed in measuring the effectiveness of IDS. Thus, the purpose of this work is to search the classifier that is capable to reduce the false alarm rates and increase the accuracy of the detection system. This study applied Artificial Immune System (AIS) in IDS. However, this study has been improved by using integration of rough set theory (RST) with Artificial Immune Recognition System 1 (AIRS1) algorithm, (Rough-AIRS1) to categorize the DoS samples. RST is expected to be able to reduce the redundant features from huge amount of data that is capable to increase the performance of the classification. Furthermore, AIS is an incremental learning approach that will minimize duplications of cases in a knowledge based. It will be efficient in terms of memory storage and searching for similarities in Intrusion Detection (IDS) attacks patterns. This study use NSL-KDD 20% train dataset to test the classifiers. Then, the performances are compared with single AIRS1 and J48 algorithm. Results from these experiments show that Rough-AIRS1 has lower number of false alarm rate compared to single AIRS but a little bit higher than J48. However, accuracy for this hybrid technique is slightly lower compared to others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":139268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

拒绝服务攻击是计算机系统和应用程序的安全威胁之一。它通常利用软件漏洞崩溃或冻结服务或网络资源或带宽限制,利用洪水攻击使所有带宽饱和。预测潜在的DOS攻击对IT部门或管理层优化入侵检测系统的安全性非常有帮助。目前,虚警率和准确率成为检测入侵检测系统有效性的主要问题。因此,本工作的目的是寻找能够降低虚警率,提高检测系统准确率的分类器。本研究将人工免疫系统(AIS)应用于IDS。然而,本研究将粗糙集理论(RST)与人工免疫识别系统1 (air1)算法(rough - air1)相结合,对DoS样本进行了分类。期望RST能够从大量数据中减少冗余特征,从而提高分类性能。此外,AIS是一种增量学习方法,可以最大限度地减少基于知识的案例重复。在内存存储和搜索入侵检测(IDS)攻击模式的相似性方面,它将是有效的。本研究使用NSL-KDD 20%训练数据集对分类器进行测试。然后,比较了单一AIRS1算法和J48算法的性能。实验结果表明,Rough-AIRS1的误报率低于单一AIRS,但略高于J48。然而,与其他技术相比,这种混合技术的准确性略低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid of rough set theory and Artificial Immune Recognition System as a solution to decrease false alarm rate in intrusion detection system
Denial of Service (DoS) attacks is one of the security threats for computer systems and applications. It usually make use of software bugs to crash or freeze a service or network resource or bandwidth limits by making use of a flood attack to saturate all bandwidth. Predicting a potential DOS attacks would be very helpful for an IT departments or managements to optimize the security of intrusion detection system (IDS). Nowadays, false alarm rates and accuracy become the main subject to be addressed in measuring the effectiveness of IDS. Thus, the purpose of this work is to search the classifier that is capable to reduce the false alarm rates and increase the accuracy of the detection system. This study applied Artificial Immune System (AIS) in IDS. However, this study has been improved by using integration of rough set theory (RST) with Artificial Immune Recognition System 1 (AIRS1) algorithm, (Rough-AIRS1) to categorize the DoS samples. RST is expected to be able to reduce the redundant features from huge amount of data that is capable to increase the performance of the classification. Furthermore, AIS is an incremental learning approach that will minimize duplications of cases in a knowledge based. It will be efficient in terms of memory storage and searching for similarities in Intrusion Detection (IDS) attacks patterns. This study use NSL-KDD 20% train dataset to test the classifiers. Then, the performances are compared with single AIRS1 and J48 algorithm. Results from these experiments show that Rough-AIRS1 has lower number of false alarm rate compared to single AIRS but a little bit higher than J48. However, accuracy for this hybrid technique is slightly lower compared to others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信