加速分布式图查询处理的数据放置策略

Daniel Janke, Steffen Staab, Martin Leinberger
{"title":"加速分布式图查询处理的数据放置策略","authors":"Daniel Janke, Steffen Staab, Martin Leinberger","doi":"10.1145/3391274.3393633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem how to optimize the data distribution to improve the query performance in distributed RDF stores running on compute node clusters. When hash-based data distribution strategies are used, the query workload tends to be equally balanced among all compute nodes whereas graph-clustering-based approaches reduce the number of transferred intermediate results. Our hypothesis is that data distribution strategies that collocate entities in small sets of closely connected data items may be able to combine the advantages of both strategies. To investigate this hypothesis, we analyze two such data distribution strategies: 1. Overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover. 2. Our novel molecule hash cover. Our analysis substantiates our hypothesis by explaining the causes for their good performance. Both strategies reduce query execution time on our set of test queries (between 5% and 98%). While overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover fares best, when it can be computed, it may lack scalability for large datasets. Our novel molecule hash cover combines scalability and major improvements of query execution time against various baseline strategies.","PeriodicalId":210506,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Big Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data placement strategies that speed-up distributed graph query processing\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Janke, Steffen Staab, Martin Leinberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3391274.3393633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the problem how to optimize the data distribution to improve the query performance in distributed RDF stores running on compute node clusters. When hash-based data distribution strategies are used, the query workload tends to be equally balanced among all compute nodes whereas graph-clustering-based approaches reduce the number of transferred intermediate results. Our hypothesis is that data distribution strategies that collocate entities in small sets of closely connected data items may be able to combine the advantages of both strategies. To investigate this hypothesis, we analyze two such data distribution strategies: 1. Overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover. 2. Our novel molecule hash cover. Our analysis substantiates our hypothesis by explaining the causes for their good performance. Both strategies reduce query execution time on our set of test queries (between 5% and 98%). While overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover fares best, when it can be computed, it may lack scalability for large datasets. Our novel molecule hash cover combines scalability and major improvements of query execution time against various baseline strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Big Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Big Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3391274.3393633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3391274.3393633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究了在计算节点集群上运行的分布式RDF存储中如何优化数据分布以提高查询性能的问题。当使用基于散列的数据分布策略时,查询工作负载倾向于在所有计算节点之间均衡,而基于图聚类的方法减少了传输中间结果的数量。我们的假设是,将实体放在紧密连接的数据项的小集合中的数据分布策略可能能够结合这两种策略的优点。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了两种这样的数据分布策略:过度分割的最小边缘盖板。2. 我们的新型分子散列盖。我们的分析通过解释他们良好表现的原因来证实我们的假设。这两种策略都减少了我们的测试查询集的查询执行时间(5%到98%之间)。虽然过度分区的最小边缘覆盖效果最好,但当它可以计算时,它可能缺乏大型数据集的可扩展性。我们的新型分子散列覆盖结合了可伸缩性和针对各种基线策略的查询执行时间的重大改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data placement strategies that speed-up distributed graph query processing
We consider the problem how to optimize the data distribution to improve the query performance in distributed RDF stores running on compute node clusters. When hash-based data distribution strategies are used, the query workload tends to be equally balanced among all compute nodes whereas graph-clustering-based approaches reduce the number of transferred intermediate results. Our hypothesis is that data distribution strategies that collocate entities in small sets of closely connected data items may be able to combine the advantages of both strategies. To investigate this hypothesis, we analyze two such data distribution strategies: 1. Overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover. 2. Our novel molecule hash cover. Our analysis substantiates our hypothesis by explaining the causes for their good performance. Both strategies reduce query execution time on our set of test queries (between 5% and 98%). While overpartitioned minimal edge-cut cover fares best, when it can be computed, it may lack scalability for large datasets. Our novel molecule hash cover combines scalability and major improvements of query execution time against various baseline strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信