策略验证性、投资效率和边际收益:一个等价

J. Hatfield, F. Kojima, S. Kominers
{"title":"策略验证性、投资效率和边际收益:一个等价","authors":"J. Hatfield, F. Kojima, S. Kominers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2544951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The market design literature has successfully designed mechanisms that achieve desirable properties such as strategy-proofness (incentive compatibility) and efficiency at the allocation stage. However, agents must often make investment decisions before participating in allocation mechanisms. These decisions are endogenous, in the sense that market participants' investments depend on the choice of mechanism. The goal of this paper is to understand when it is possible to design fully efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that both are efficient ex post and induce agents to make efficient investment decisions ex ante. To do so, we consider a general public choice setting (with transfers). Our framework includes, but is not limited to, object allocation settings such as auctions as well as two-sided matching environments such as residency matching. In our setting, payoffs depend not only on the outcome selected by the mechanism but also on agents' pre-mechanism investment choices. We say that a mechanism induces efficient investment by an agent if the investment choices that maximize the utility of that agent coincide with the investment choices that maximize social welfare. Our first main result shows that a mechanism induces efficient investment if and only if it provides marginal rewards, in the sense that the change in an agent's utility when that agent adjusts her investment is equal to the associated change in social welfare. For our second main result, we focus on ex post efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that select welfare-maximizing outcomes given agents' investment decisions. We show that for ex post efficient mechanisms, inducing efficient investment and providing marginal rewards are both equivalent to strategy-proofness. We extend our equivalence results to approximate versions of the aforementioned properties. Our results imply that under the Kelso--Crawford (1982) worker-optimal stable mechanism (with discrete transfers), workers are incentivized to make approximately efficient human capital investments before entering the labor market (conditional on the actions of firms).","PeriodicalId":203155,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy-proofness, investment efficiency, and marginal returns: an equivalence\",\"authors\":\"J. Hatfield, F. Kojima, S. Kominers\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2544951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The market design literature has successfully designed mechanisms that achieve desirable properties such as strategy-proofness (incentive compatibility) and efficiency at the allocation stage. However, agents must often make investment decisions before participating in allocation mechanisms. These decisions are endogenous, in the sense that market participants' investments depend on the choice of mechanism. The goal of this paper is to understand when it is possible to design fully efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that both are efficient ex post and induce agents to make efficient investment decisions ex ante. To do so, we consider a general public choice setting (with transfers). Our framework includes, but is not limited to, object allocation settings such as auctions as well as two-sided matching environments such as residency matching. In our setting, payoffs depend not only on the outcome selected by the mechanism but also on agents' pre-mechanism investment choices. We say that a mechanism induces efficient investment by an agent if the investment choices that maximize the utility of that agent coincide with the investment choices that maximize social welfare. Our first main result shows that a mechanism induces efficient investment if and only if it provides marginal rewards, in the sense that the change in an agent's utility when that agent adjusts her investment is equal to the associated change in social welfare. For our second main result, we focus on ex post efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that select welfare-maximizing outcomes given agents' investment decisions. We show that for ex post efficient mechanisms, inducing efficient investment and providing marginal rewards are both equivalent to strategy-proofness. We extend our equivalence results to approximate versions of the aforementioned properties. Our results imply that under the Kelso--Crawford (1982) worker-optimal stable mechanism (with discrete transfers), workers are incentivized to make approximately efficient human capital investments before entering the labor market (conditional on the actions of firms).\",\"PeriodicalId\":203155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2544951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2544951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

市场设计文献已经成功地设计了一些机制,在配置阶段实现了理想的特性,如策略验证性(激励兼容性)和效率。然而,代理往往必须在参与分配机制之前做出投资决策。这些决策是内生的,也就是说,市场参与者的投资取决于机制的选择。本文的目标是了解何时有可能设计出完全有效的机制,即既事后有效又诱导代理人事前做出有效投资决策的机制。为了做到这一点,我们考虑一个一般的公共选择设置(与转移)。我们的框架包括(但不限于)对象分配设置,如拍卖,以及双边匹配环境,如居住地匹配。在我们的设置中,收益不仅取决于机制选择的结果,还取决于代理人在机制前的投资选择。我们说,如果使代理人效用最大化的投资选择与使社会福利最大化的投资选择相一致,那么某种机制就会诱导代理人进行有效投资。我们的第一个主要结果表明,当且仅当一种机制提供边际报酬时,即当一个主体调整其投资时,其效用的变化等于相关的社会福利变化时,该机制才会诱导有效投资。对于我们的第二个主要结果,我们关注事后效率机制,即在给定代理人投资决策的情况下选择福利最大化结果的机制。我们表明,对于事后有效机制,诱导有效投资和提供边际回报都等同于策略证明。我们将等价结果推广到上述性质的近似版本。我们的研究结果表明,在Kelso—Crawford(1982)的工人最优稳定机制(离散转移)下,工人被激励在进入劳动力市场之前进行近似有效的人力资本投资(以企业的行为为条件)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy-proofness, investment efficiency, and marginal returns: an equivalence
The market design literature has successfully designed mechanisms that achieve desirable properties such as strategy-proofness (incentive compatibility) and efficiency at the allocation stage. However, agents must often make investment decisions before participating in allocation mechanisms. These decisions are endogenous, in the sense that market participants' investments depend on the choice of mechanism. The goal of this paper is to understand when it is possible to design fully efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that both are efficient ex post and induce agents to make efficient investment decisions ex ante. To do so, we consider a general public choice setting (with transfers). Our framework includes, but is not limited to, object allocation settings such as auctions as well as two-sided matching environments such as residency matching. In our setting, payoffs depend not only on the outcome selected by the mechanism but also on agents' pre-mechanism investment choices. We say that a mechanism induces efficient investment by an agent if the investment choices that maximize the utility of that agent coincide with the investment choices that maximize social welfare. Our first main result shows that a mechanism induces efficient investment if and only if it provides marginal rewards, in the sense that the change in an agent's utility when that agent adjusts her investment is equal to the associated change in social welfare. For our second main result, we focus on ex post efficient mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that select welfare-maximizing outcomes given agents' investment decisions. We show that for ex post efficient mechanisms, inducing efficient investment and providing marginal rewards are both equivalent to strategy-proofness. We extend our equivalence results to approximate versions of the aforementioned properties. Our results imply that under the Kelso--Crawford (1982) worker-optimal stable mechanism (with discrete transfers), workers are incentivized to make approximately efficient human capital investments before entering the labor market (conditional on the actions of firms).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信