高频做市对大型机构交易

Robert A. Korajczyk, Dermot Murphy
{"title":"高频做市对大型机构交易","authors":"Robert A. Korajczyk, Dermot Murphy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2567016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study high-frequency trader (HFT) marker maker behavior in the presence of large trade packages. HFTs lose money on trading and make money from liquidity rebates. HFT liquidity provision is significantly reduced for large ``stressful'' trades with this reduction being more pronounced when an HFT assumes the designated market maker role. Over the life of a large trade, HFTs initially accommodate the order but switch to competing with the order. This is due to both inventory management and order anticipation. Average implementation shortfall for non-stressful (stressful) trades is 11 (35) basis points and is significantly affected by HFT liquidity provision.","PeriodicalId":172652,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Frequency Market Making to Large Institutional Trades\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Korajczyk, Dermot Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2567016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study high-frequency trader (HFT) marker maker behavior in the presence of large trade packages. HFTs lose money on trading and make money from liquidity rebates. HFT liquidity provision is significantly reduced for large ``stressful'' trades with this reduction being more pronounced when an HFT assumes the designated market maker role. Over the life of a large trade, HFTs initially accommodate the order but switch to competing with the order. This is due to both inventory management and order anticipation. Average implementation shortfall for non-stressful (stressful) trades is 11 (35) basis points and is significantly affected by HFT liquidity provision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"102\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2567016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Market Structure (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2567016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

摘要

我们研究高频交易者(HFT)做市商在存在大量交易包时的行为。高频交易者在交易中赔钱,从流动性回扣中赚钱。对于大型“压力”交易,高频交易的流动性供应显著减少,当高频交易承担指定的做市商角色时,这种减少更为明显。在一笔大额交易的生命周期中,高频交易最初会适应订单,但会转变为与订单竞争。这是由于库存管理和订单预期。非压力(压力)交易的平均执行缺口为11(35)个基点,并受到高频交易流动性供应的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Frequency Market Making to Large Institutional Trades
We study high-frequency trader (HFT) marker maker behavior in the presence of large trade packages. HFTs lose money on trading and make money from liquidity rebates. HFT liquidity provision is significantly reduced for large ``stressful'' trades with this reduction being more pronounced when an HFT assumes the designated market maker role. Over the life of a large trade, HFTs initially accommodate the order but switch to competing with the order. This is due to both inventory management and order anticipation. Average implementation shortfall for non-stressful (stressful) trades is 11 (35) basis points and is significantly affected by HFT liquidity provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信