{"title":"世界的共存:或奇点的交织","authors":"F. Raffoul","doi":"10.1353/CGL.2011.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like in the following pages to engage JeanLuc Nancy’s thought of the world, and of what I chose to call “the co-existence of the world,” a co-existence exceeding the anthropological enclosure which will have to be understood as an intertwining of singularities. Indeed, as for Nancy the world is not a container or an indifferent milieu, but the very sharing of existence, one would speak of a co-existence of the world, in the subjective genitive, or better, of the world itself as co-existence. Nancy does state that everything takes place between us, but this between “has neither consistency nor continuity;”1 it is not a connective tissue, a cement, a bridge, a “connection.” The between of our co-existence is not an indifferent and external milieu: “there is no intermediate and mediating ‘milieu.’ Meaning is not a milieu in which we are immersed. There is no mi-lieu [between place].”2 Rather, the between is the stretching out of singularities, its spacing, where each singularity touches the others in a singular intertwining [entrecroisement] or interlacing [entrelacement]. Neither exteriority nor separation, but intertwining: “The intertwining of the limit and of the continuity between the several theres must determine proximity not as pure juxtaposition but as composition 1 Jean-Luc Nancy. Being Singular Plural. Stanford CA, Stanford University Press, 2000: 5. Hereafter cited as BSP, followed by page number.","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Coexistence of the World: Or the Intertwining of Singularities\",\"authors\":\"F. Raffoul\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/CGL.2011.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I would like in the following pages to engage JeanLuc Nancy’s thought of the world, and of what I chose to call “the co-existence of the world,” a co-existence exceeding the anthropological enclosure which will have to be understood as an intertwining of singularities. Indeed, as for Nancy the world is not a container or an indifferent milieu, but the very sharing of existence, one would speak of a co-existence of the world, in the subjective genitive, or better, of the world itself as co-existence. Nancy does state that everything takes place between us, but this between “has neither consistency nor continuity;”1 it is not a connective tissue, a cement, a bridge, a “connection.” The between of our co-existence is not an indifferent and external milieu: “there is no intermediate and mediating ‘milieu.’ Meaning is not a milieu in which we are immersed. There is no mi-lieu [between place].”2 Rather, the between is the stretching out of singularities, its spacing, where each singularity touches the others in a singular intertwining [entrecroisement] or interlacing [entrelacement]. Neither exteriority nor separation, but intertwining: “The intertwining of the limit and of the continuity between the several theres must determine proximity not as pure juxtaposition but as composition 1 Jean-Luc Nancy. Being Singular Plural. Stanford CA, Stanford University Press, 2000: 5. Hereafter cited as BSP, followed by page number.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/CGL.2011.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/CGL.2011.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Coexistence of the World: Or the Intertwining of Singularities
I would like in the following pages to engage JeanLuc Nancy’s thought of the world, and of what I chose to call “the co-existence of the world,” a co-existence exceeding the anthropological enclosure which will have to be understood as an intertwining of singularities. Indeed, as for Nancy the world is not a container or an indifferent milieu, but the very sharing of existence, one would speak of a co-existence of the world, in the subjective genitive, or better, of the world itself as co-existence. Nancy does state that everything takes place between us, but this between “has neither consistency nor continuity;”1 it is not a connective tissue, a cement, a bridge, a “connection.” The between of our co-existence is not an indifferent and external milieu: “there is no intermediate and mediating ‘milieu.’ Meaning is not a milieu in which we are immersed. There is no mi-lieu [between place].”2 Rather, the between is the stretching out of singularities, its spacing, where each singularity touches the others in a singular intertwining [entrecroisement] or interlacing [entrelacement]. Neither exteriority nor separation, but intertwining: “The intertwining of the limit and of the continuity between the several theres must determine proximity not as pure juxtaposition but as composition 1 Jean-Luc Nancy. Being Singular Plural. Stanford CA, Stanford University Press, 2000: 5. Hereafter cited as BSP, followed by page number.