基于机器学习的创伤分类模型中的群体偏见和复杂性/准确性权衡

Katherine Phillips, Katherine E. Brown, Steve Talbert, Douglas A. Talbert
{"title":"基于机器学习的创伤分类模型中的群体偏见和复杂性/准确性权衡","authors":"Katherine Phillips, Katherine E. Brown, Steve Talbert, Douglas A. Talbert","doi":"10.32473/flairs.36.133358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trauma triage occurs in suboptimal environments for making consequential decisions. Published triage studies demonstrate the extremes of the complexity/accuracy tradeoff, either studying simple models with poor accuracy or very complex models with accuracies nearing published goals. Using a Level I Trauma Center’s registry cases (n=50,644), this study describes, uses, and derives observations from a methodology to more thoroughly examine this tradeoff. This or similar methods can provide the insight needed for practitioners to balance understandability with accuracy. Additionally, this study incorporates an evaluation of group-based fairness into this tradeoff analysis to provide an additional dimension of insight into model selection. The experiments allow us to draw several conclusions regarding the machine learning models in the domain of trauma triage and demonstrate the value of our tradeoff analysis to provide insight into choices regarding model complexity, model accuracy, and model fairness.","PeriodicalId":302103,"journal":{"name":"The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Bias and the Complexity/Accuracy Tradeoff in Machine Learning-Based Trauma Triage Models\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Phillips, Katherine E. Brown, Steve Talbert, Douglas A. Talbert\",\"doi\":\"10.32473/flairs.36.133358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trauma triage occurs in suboptimal environments for making consequential decisions. Published triage studies demonstrate the extremes of the complexity/accuracy tradeoff, either studying simple models with poor accuracy or very complex models with accuracies nearing published goals. Using a Level I Trauma Center’s registry cases (n=50,644), this study describes, uses, and derives observations from a methodology to more thoroughly examine this tradeoff. This or similar methods can provide the insight needed for practitioners to balance understandability with accuracy. Additionally, this study incorporates an evaluation of group-based fairness into this tradeoff analysis to provide an additional dimension of insight into model selection. The experiments allow us to draw several conclusions regarding the machine learning models in the domain of trauma triage and demonstrate the value of our tradeoff analysis to provide insight into choices regarding model complexity, model accuracy, and model fairness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.36.133358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.36.133358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤分诊发生在次优环境中,以做出相应的决定。已发表的分类研究展示了复杂性/准确性权衡的极端情况,要么研究精度较低的简单模型,要么研究精度接近已发表目标的非常复杂的模型。使用一级创伤中心的注册病例(n=50,644),本研究描述、使用并从一种方法中得出观察结果,以更彻底地检查这种权衡。这种或类似的方法可以为从业者提供平衡可理解性和准确性所需的洞察力。此外,本研究将基于群体的公平性评估纳入了这种权衡分析,为模型选择提供了一个额外的维度。实验使我们能够得出关于创伤分类领域的机器学习模型的几个结论,并展示了我们权衡分析的价值,以提供关于模型复杂性,模型准确性和模型公平性的选择的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group Bias and the Complexity/Accuracy Tradeoff in Machine Learning-Based Trauma Triage Models
Trauma triage occurs in suboptimal environments for making consequential decisions. Published triage studies demonstrate the extremes of the complexity/accuracy tradeoff, either studying simple models with poor accuracy or very complex models with accuracies nearing published goals. Using a Level I Trauma Center’s registry cases (n=50,644), this study describes, uses, and derives observations from a methodology to more thoroughly examine this tradeoff. This or similar methods can provide the insight needed for practitioners to balance understandability with accuracy. Additionally, this study incorporates an evaluation of group-based fairness into this tradeoff analysis to provide an additional dimension of insight into model selection. The experiments allow us to draw several conclusions regarding the machine learning models in the domain of trauma triage and demonstrate the value of our tradeoff analysis to provide insight into choices regarding model complexity, model accuracy, and model fairness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信