通过混合缺陷内容和有效性模型管理软件质量

Michael Kläs, Frank Elberzhager, H. Nakao
{"title":"通过混合缺陷内容和有效性模型管理软件质量","authors":"Michael Kläs, Frank Elberzhager, H. Nakao","doi":"10.1145/1414004.1414067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality assurance (QA) plays a crucial role in today's software development. However, methods and models proposed in literature to support QA management suffer from several drawbacks. Many are specialized to certain activities like system test or inspections. They commonly support only one application purpose, e.g., planning or controlling, and are often applicable only after measurement data has been collected for several historical applications. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed a method that can be applied to QA activities during any phase, and which supports comprehensive quality management related tasks: improvement, planning, and controlling. To be applicable in practice, the method combines the available measurement data with expert judgment to build context-specific models. In addition, the method provides early benefits, while motivating the collection of measurement data by presenting possible improvement directions. The paper presents the general concepts behind the method and research questions to be answered in upcoming empirical studies.","PeriodicalId":124452,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing software quality through a hybrid defect content and effectiveness model\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kläs, Frank Elberzhager, H. Nakao\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1414004.1414067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quality assurance (QA) plays a crucial role in today's software development. However, methods and models proposed in literature to support QA management suffer from several drawbacks. Many are specialized to certain activities like system test or inspections. They commonly support only one application purpose, e.g., planning or controlling, and are often applicable only after measurement data has been collected for several historical applications. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed a method that can be applied to QA activities during any phase, and which supports comprehensive quality management related tasks: improvement, planning, and controlling. To be applicable in practice, the method combines the available measurement data with expert judgment to build context-specific models. In addition, the method provides early benefits, while motivating the collection of measurement data by presenting possible improvement directions. The paper presents the general concepts behind the method and research questions to be answered in upcoming empirical studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1414004.1414067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1414004.1414067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

质量保证(QA)在当今的软件开发中扮演着至关重要的角色。然而,文献中提出的支持QA管理的方法和模型存在一些缺点。许多专门用于系统测试或检查等特定活动。它们通常只支持一个应用目的,例如,计划或控制,并且通常只在为几个历史应用收集了测量数据之后才适用。为了克服这些缺点,我们开发了一种可以应用于任何阶段的QA活动的方法,它支持全面的质量管理相关任务:改进、计划和控制。该方法将现有的测量数据与专家的判断相结合,建立了基于情境的模型,使其能够应用于实际。此外,该方法提供了早期的好处,同时通过提出可能的改进方向来激励测量数据的收集。本文介绍了该方法背后的一般概念,并在即将进行的实证研究中回答了研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing software quality through a hybrid defect content and effectiveness model
Quality assurance (QA) plays a crucial role in today's software development. However, methods and models proposed in literature to support QA management suffer from several drawbacks. Many are specialized to certain activities like system test or inspections. They commonly support only one application purpose, e.g., planning or controlling, and are often applicable only after measurement data has been collected for several historical applications. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed a method that can be applied to QA activities during any phase, and which supports comprehensive quality management related tasks: improvement, planning, and controlling. To be applicable in practice, the method combines the available measurement data with expert judgment to build context-specific models. In addition, the method provides early benefits, while motivating the collection of measurement data by presenting possible improvement directions. The paper presents the general concepts behind the method and research questions to be answered in upcoming empirical studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信