第一代和第二代Kinect多媒体应用性能评估

Simone Zennaro, Matteo Munaro, S. Milani, P. Zanuttigh, A. Bernardi, S. Ghidoni, E. Menegatti
{"title":"第一代和第二代Kinect多媒体应用性能评估","authors":"Simone Zennaro, Matteo Munaro, S. Milani, P. Zanuttigh, A. Bernardi, S. Ghidoni, E. Menegatti","doi":"10.1109/ICME.2015.7177380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microsoft Kinect had a key role in the development of consumer depth sensors being the device that brought depth acquisition to the mass market. Despite the success of this sensor, with the introduction of the second generation, Microsoft has completely changed the technology behind the sensor from structured light to Time-Of-Flight. This paper presents a comparison of the data provided by the first and second generation Kinect in order to explain the achievements that have been obtained with the switch of technology. After an accurate analysis of the accuracy of the two sensors under different conditions, two sample applications, i.e., 3D reconstruction and people tracking, are presented and used to compare the performance of the two sensors.","PeriodicalId":146271,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"125","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of the 1st and 2nd generation Kinect for multimedia applications\",\"authors\":\"Simone Zennaro, Matteo Munaro, S. Milani, P. Zanuttigh, A. Bernardi, S. Ghidoni, E. Menegatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICME.2015.7177380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Microsoft Kinect had a key role in the development of consumer depth sensors being the device that brought depth acquisition to the mass market. Despite the success of this sensor, with the introduction of the second generation, Microsoft has completely changed the technology behind the sensor from structured light to Time-Of-Flight. This paper presents a comparison of the data provided by the first and second generation Kinect in order to explain the achievements that have been obtained with the switch of technology. After an accurate analysis of the accuracy of the two sensors under different conditions, two sample applications, i.e., 3D reconstruction and people tracking, are presented and used to compare the performance of the two sensors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"125\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2015.7177380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2015.7177380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

摘要

微软Kinect在消费者深度传感器的发展中发挥了关键作用,它将深度采集技术带入了大众市场。尽管这款传感器取得了成功,但随着第二代传感器的推出,微软已经完全改变了传感器背后的技术,从结构光到飞行时间。本文将第一代和第二代Kinect所提供的数据进行比较,以说明随着技术的切换所取得的成就。在准确分析了两种传感器在不同条件下的精度后,提出了两种应用示例,即三维重建和人员跟踪,并使用它们来比较两种传感器的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of the 1st and 2nd generation Kinect for multimedia applications
Microsoft Kinect had a key role in the development of consumer depth sensors being the device that brought depth acquisition to the mass market. Despite the success of this sensor, with the introduction of the second generation, Microsoft has completely changed the technology behind the sensor from structured light to Time-Of-Flight. This paper presents a comparison of the data provided by the first and second generation Kinect in order to explain the achievements that have been obtained with the switch of technology. After an accurate analysis of the accuracy of the two sensors under different conditions, two sample applications, i.e., 3D reconstruction and people tracking, are presented and used to compare the performance of the two sensors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信