{"title":"范数变体的存在性","authors":"C. Haesemeyer, C. Weibel","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv941tx2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter constructs norm varieties for symbols ª = {𝑎1, ...,𝑎𝑛} over a field 𝑘 of characteristic 0, and starts the proof that norm varieties are Rost varieties. It first recalls the definition of a norm variety for a symbol ª in 𝐾𝑀\n 𝑛(𝑘)/𝓁; if 𝑛 ≥ 2 and 𝑘 is 𝓁-special, norm varieties are geometrically irreducible. Next, the chapter uses the Chain Lemma to produce a specific ν\n n−1-variety ℙ(𝒜), and a pencil Q of splitting varieties over 𝔸1—{0} whose fibers 𝑄𝑊 are fixed point equivalent to ℙ (𝒜). Using a bordism result, this chapter shows that any equivariant resolution 𝑄(ª) of 𝑄𝑊 is a ν\n n−1-variety. Next, one of Rost's degree formulas is used to show that any norm variety for ª is ν\n n−1 because 𝑄(ª) is. Finally, a norm variety for ª is constructed by induction on 𝑛, making use of the global inductive assumption that BL(n − 1) holds.","PeriodicalId":145287,"journal":{"name":"The Norm Residue Theorem in Motivic Cohomology","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existence of Norm Varieties\",\"authors\":\"C. Haesemeyer, C. Weibel\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv941tx2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter constructs norm varieties for symbols ª = {𝑎1, ...,𝑎𝑛} over a field 𝑘 of characteristic 0, and starts the proof that norm varieties are Rost varieties. It first recalls the definition of a norm variety for a symbol ª in 𝐾𝑀\\n 𝑛(𝑘)/𝓁; if 𝑛 ≥ 2 and 𝑘 is 𝓁-special, norm varieties are geometrically irreducible. Next, the chapter uses the Chain Lemma to produce a specific ν\\n n−1-variety ℙ(𝒜), and a pencil Q of splitting varieties over 𝔸1—{0} whose fibers 𝑄𝑊 are fixed point equivalent to ℙ (𝒜). Using a bordism result, this chapter shows that any equivariant resolution 𝑄(ª) of 𝑄𝑊 is a ν\\n n−1-variety. Next, one of Rost's degree formulas is used to show that any norm variety for ª is ν\\n n−1 because 𝑄(ª) is. Finally, a norm variety for ª is constructed by induction on 𝑛, making use of the global inductive assumption that BL(n − 1) holds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Norm Residue Theorem in Motivic Cohomology\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Norm Residue Theorem in Motivic Cohomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv941tx2.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Norm Residue Theorem in Motivic Cohomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv941tx2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter constructs norm varieties for symbols ª = {𝑎1, ...,𝑎𝑛} over a field 𝑘 of characteristic 0, and starts the proof that norm varieties are Rost varieties. It first recalls the definition of a norm variety for a symbol ª in 𝐾𝑀
𝑛(𝑘)/𝓁; if 𝑛 ≥ 2 and 𝑘 is 𝓁-special, norm varieties are geometrically irreducible. Next, the chapter uses the Chain Lemma to produce a specific ν
n−1-variety ℙ(𝒜), and a pencil Q of splitting varieties over 𝔸1—{0} whose fibers 𝑄𝑊 are fixed point equivalent to ℙ (𝒜). Using a bordism result, this chapter shows that any equivariant resolution 𝑄(ª) of 𝑄𝑊 is a ν
n−1-variety. Next, one of Rost's degree formulas is used to show that any norm variety for ª is ν
n−1 because 𝑄(ª) is. Finally, a norm variety for ª is constructed by induction on 𝑛, making use of the global inductive assumption that BL(n − 1) holds.