用情感话语与中性话语的韵律距离分析英语情感话语

S. Yi
{"title":"用情感话语与中性话语的韵律距离分析英语情感话语","authors":"S. Yi","doi":"10.13064/ksss.2020.12.3.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of emotional English utterances with 7 emotions (calm, happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgust, surprised) was conducted using the measurement of prosodic distance between 672 emotional and 48 neutral utterances. Applying the technique proposed in the automatic evaluation model of English pronunciation to the present study on emotional utterances, Euclidean distance measurement of 3 prosodic elements such as F0, intensity and duration extracted from emotional and neutral utterances was utilized. This paper, furthermore, extended the analytical methods to include Euclidean distance normalization, z-score and z-score normalization resulting in 4 groups of measurement schemes (sqrF0, sqrINT, sqrDUR; norsqrF0, norsqrINT, norsqrDUR; sqrzF0, sqrzINT, sqrzDUR; norsqrzF0, norsqrzINT, norsqrzDUR). All of the results from perceptual analysis and acoustical analysis of emotional utteances consistently indicated the greater effectiveness of norsqrF0, norsqrINT and norsqrDUR, among 4 groups of measurement schemes, which normalized the Euclidean measurement. The greatest acoustical change of prosodic information influenced by emotion was shown in the values of F0 followed by duration and intensity in descending order according to the effect size based on the estimation of distance between emotional utterances and neutral counterparts. Tukey Post Hoc test revealed 4 homogeneous subsets (calm<disgust, sad<happy, surprised<surprised, angry, fearful) statistically determined from the measurement of norsqrF0 and 3 homogeneous subsets (surprised, happy, fearful, sad, calm<calm, angry<angry, disgust) from norsqrDUR. Furthermore, the analysis of each of the 7 emotions showed that the present research outcome is in the same vein as the results of the previous study.","PeriodicalId":255285,"journal":{"name":"Phonetics and Speech Sciences","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of emotional English utterances using the prosodic\\n distance between emotional and neutral utterances\",\"authors\":\"S. Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.13064/ksss.2020.12.3.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An analysis of emotional English utterances with 7 emotions (calm, happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgust, surprised) was conducted using the measurement of prosodic distance between 672 emotional and 48 neutral utterances. Applying the technique proposed in the automatic evaluation model of English pronunciation to the present study on emotional utterances, Euclidean distance measurement of 3 prosodic elements such as F0, intensity and duration extracted from emotional and neutral utterances was utilized. This paper, furthermore, extended the analytical methods to include Euclidean distance normalization, z-score and z-score normalization resulting in 4 groups of measurement schemes (sqrF0, sqrINT, sqrDUR; norsqrF0, norsqrINT, norsqrDUR; sqrzF0, sqrzINT, sqrzDUR; norsqrzF0, norsqrzINT, norsqrzDUR). All of the results from perceptual analysis and acoustical analysis of emotional utteances consistently indicated the greater effectiveness of norsqrF0, norsqrINT and norsqrDUR, among 4 groups of measurement schemes, which normalized the Euclidean measurement. The greatest acoustical change of prosodic information influenced by emotion was shown in the values of F0 followed by duration and intensity in descending order according to the effect size based on the estimation of distance between emotional utterances and neutral counterparts. Tukey Post Hoc test revealed 4 homogeneous subsets (calm<disgust, sad<happy, surprised<surprised, angry, fearful) statistically determined from the measurement of norsqrF0 and 3 homogeneous subsets (surprised, happy, fearful, sad, calm<calm, angry<angry, disgust) from norsqrDUR. Furthermore, the analysis of each of the 7 emotions showed that the present research outcome is in the same vein as the results of the previous study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phonetics and Speech Sciences\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phonetics and Speech Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13064/ksss.2020.12.3.025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonetics and Speech Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13064/ksss.2020.12.3.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过测量672个情绪型英语话语与48个中性话语之间的韵律距离,对平静、快乐、悲伤、愤怒、恐惧、厌恶、惊讶7种情绪的英语情感话语进行了分析。将英语语音自动评价模型中提出的技术应用到本次情绪话语研究中,对从情绪和中性话语中提取的F0、强度、持续时间等3个韵律要素进行欧几里得距离测量。在此基础上,将分析方法扩展到欧氏距离归一化、z-score和z-score归一化,得到4组测量方案(sqrF0、sqrINT、sqrDUR;norsqr0, norsqrINT, norsqrDUR;sqrzF0, sqrzINT, sqrzDUR;norsqrzF0, norsqrzINT, norsqrzDUR)。情绪言语的知觉分析和声学分析结果一致表明,在4组测量方案中,norsqrF0、norsqrINT和norsqrDUR的有效性更高,使欧几里得测量规范化。受情绪影响的韵律信息的声学变化最大的是F0值,其次是持续时间和强度,根据对情绪话语与中性话语之间距离的估计,根据效应大小依次递减。Tukey事后检验揭示了4个同质子集(冷静<厌恶,悲伤<快乐,惊讶<惊讶,愤怒,恐惧)从norsqrF0的测量中统计确定,3个同质子集(惊讶,快乐,恐惧,悲伤,冷静<冷静,愤怒<愤怒,厌恶)从norsqrDUR。此外,对这7种情绪的分析表明,目前的研究结果与之前的研究结果是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of emotional English utterances using the prosodic distance between emotional and neutral utterances
An analysis of emotional English utterances with 7 emotions (calm, happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgust, surprised) was conducted using the measurement of prosodic distance between 672 emotional and 48 neutral utterances. Applying the technique proposed in the automatic evaluation model of English pronunciation to the present study on emotional utterances, Euclidean distance measurement of 3 prosodic elements such as F0, intensity and duration extracted from emotional and neutral utterances was utilized. This paper, furthermore, extended the analytical methods to include Euclidean distance normalization, z-score and z-score normalization resulting in 4 groups of measurement schemes (sqrF0, sqrINT, sqrDUR; norsqrF0, norsqrINT, norsqrDUR; sqrzF0, sqrzINT, sqrzDUR; norsqrzF0, norsqrzINT, norsqrzDUR). All of the results from perceptual analysis and acoustical analysis of emotional utteances consistently indicated the greater effectiveness of norsqrF0, norsqrINT and norsqrDUR, among 4 groups of measurement schemes, which normalized the Euclidean measurement. The greatest acoustical change of prosodic information influenced by emotion was shown in the values of F0 followed by duration and intensity in descending order according to the effect size based on the estimation of distance between emotional utterances and neutral counterparts. Tukey Post Hoc test revealed 4 homogeneous subsets (calm
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信