{"title":"数据库管理系统的结构化评估","authors":"G.L. Schaps, N. Rishe","doi":"10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analytical framework for evaluating database management systems is presented. Four RDBMSs (relational database management systems) are chosen for design review: Sybase, Oracle, Ingres, and informix. Five categories of design characteristics are considered: (1) query processing, (2) query optimization, (3) distributed query, (4) concurrency control, and (5) crash recovery. On the basis of the material considered here, Sybase appears to have the best distributed architecture and the most advanced transaction control, integrity checks, and crash recovery features.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":389644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structured evaluation of database management systems\",\"authors\":\"G.L. Schaps, N. Rishe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An analytical framework for evaluating database management systems is presented. Four RDBMSs (relational database management systems) are chosen for design review: Sybase, Oracle, Ingres, and informix. Five categories of design characteristics are considered: (1) query processing, (2) query optimization, (3) distributed query, (4) concurrency control, and (5) crash recovery. On the basis of the material considered here, Sybase appears to have the best distributed architecture and the most advanced transaction control, integrity checks, and crash recovery features.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":389644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structured evaluation of database management systems
An analytical framework for evaluating database management systems is presented. Four RDBMSs (relational database management systems) are chosen for design review: Sybase, Oracle, Ingres, and informix. Five categories of design characteristics are considered: (1) query processing, (2) query optimization, (3) distributed query, (4) concurrency control, and (5) crash recovery. On the basis of the material considered here, Sybase appears to have the best distributed architecture and the most advanced transaction control, integrity checks, and crash recovery features.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
