内生风险和市场稳定的危险

Jim Pasztor
{"title":"内生风险和市场稳定的危险","authors":"Jim Pasztor","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1934466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are various methods and models where one can quantify risks and try to predict future correlations. However, the flaw with any given financial model is that certain assumptions must be made, and when the market deviates too much from these assumptions, then the model falls apart. Under traditional valuation methods, risk is divided into systematic and unsystematic risk. But there is another way to look at risk, and that is whether it is exogenous or endogenous. Exogenous risk represents risks found outside the financial system, and is taken into account when doing fundamental analysis. Endogenous risk, on the other hand, is the risk found within the financial system itself. This type of risk is the most dangerous, and is often overlooked or not taken seriously enough by advisers and financial planners. Endogenous risk comes from aberrations and shocks that are generated within the financial system itself, which then have a ripple effect throughout the financial markets. It can cause extreme volatility (and losses) for investors and lead to behavior that may not be in the best interest of a client, namely selling when prices are depressed. The number of events occurring because of endogenous risk is increasing, which should be a source of concern. The emergence of financialized capitalism, the increase in speculation and decrease in investing, the growth of derivatives and use of leverage, the practice of shadow banking and lack of transparency, and the existence of institutions that are “too big to fail” all increase the likelihood of an endogenous event. Given the potential impact of endogenous risk, and the threat it poses, it should be taken into account when putting together financial plans and constructing client portfolios.","PeriodicalId":180552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Consulting","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endogenous Risk and Dangers to Market Stability\",\"authors\":\"Jim Pasztor\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1934466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are various methods and models where one can quantify risks and try to predict future correlations. However, the flaw with any given financial model is that certain assumptions must be made, and when the market deviates too much from these assumptions, then the model falls apart. Under traditional valuation methods, risk is divided into systematic and unsystematic risk. But there is another way to look at risk, and that is whether it is exogenous or endogenous. Exogenous risk represents risks found outside the financial system, and is taken into account when doing fundamental analysis. Endogenous risk, on the other hand, is the risk found within the financial system itself. This type of risk is the most dangerous, and is often overlooked or not taken seriously enough by advisers and financial planners. Endogenous risk comes from aberrations and shocks that are generated within the financial system itself, which then have a ripple effect throughout the financial markets. It can cause extreme volatility (and losses) for investors and lead to behavior that may not be in the best interest of a client, namely selling when prices are depressed. The number of events occurring because of endogenous risk is increasing, which should be a source of concern. The emergence of financialized capitalism, the increase in speculation and decrease in investing, the growth of derivatives and use of leverage, the practice of shadow banking and lack of transparency, and the existence of institutions that are “too big to fail” all increase the likelihood of an endogenous event. Given the potential impact of endogenous risk, and the threat it poses, it should be taken into account when putting together financial plans and constructing client portfolios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investment Consulting\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investment Consulting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1934466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Consulting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1934466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有各种各样的方法和模型可以量化风险并试图预测未来的相关性。然而,任何给定的金融模型的缺陷在于,必须做出某些假设,当市场偏离这些假设太多时,模型就会崩溃。在传统的评估方法中,风险分为系统性风险和非系统性风险。但还有另一种看待风险的方式,那就是它是外源性的还是内源性的。外生风险是指在金融体系之外发现的风险,在进行基本面分析时要考虑到这些风险。另一方面,内生风险是金融体系内部存在的风险。这类风险是最危险的,往往被顾问和理财规划师忽视或不够重视。内生风险来自金融体系内部产生的异常和冲击,然后在整个金融市场产生连锁反应。它可能会给投资者带来极端的波动(和损失),并导致可能不符合客户最佳利益的行为,即在价格低迷时卖出。由于内生风险而发生的事件数量正在增加,这应该引起关注。金融化资本主义的出现,投机的增加和投资的减少,衍生品的增长和杠杆的使用,影子银行的实践和缺乏透明度,以及“太大而不能倒”的机构的存在,都增加了内生事件发生的可能性。鉴于内生风险的潜在影响及其构成的威胁,在制定财务计划和构建客户投资组合时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endogenous Risk and Dangers to Market Stability
There are various methods and models where one can quantify risks and try to predict future correlations. However, the flaw with any given financial model is that certain assumptions must be made, and when the market deviates too much from these assumptions, then the model falls apart. Under traditional valuation methods, risk is divided into systematic and unsystematic risk. But there is another way to look at risk, and that is whether it is exogenous or endogenous. Exogenous risk represents risks found outside the financial system, and is taken into account when doing fundamental analysis. Endogenous risk, on the other hand, is the risk found within the financial system itself. This type of risk is the most dangerous, and is often overlooked or not taken seriously enough by advisers and financial planners. Endogenous risk comes from aberrations and shocks that are generated within the financial system itself, which then have a ripple effect throughout the financial markets. It can cause extreme volatility (and losses) for investors and lead to behavior that may not be in the best interest of a client, namely selling when prices are depressed. The number of events occurring because of endogenous risk is increasing, which should be a source of concern. The emergence of financialized capitalism, the increase in speculation and decrease in investing, the growth of derivatives and use of leverage, the practice of shadow banking and lack of transparency, and the existence of institutions that are “too big to fail” all increase the likelihood of an endogenous event. Given the potential impact of endogenous risk, and the threat it poses, it should be taken into account when putting together financial plans and constructing client portfolios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信