定性探索系统工程在南非科学委员会的应用

H. H. Malik, L. Erasmus, J. Pretorius
{"title":"定性探索系统工程在南非科学委员会的应用","authors":"H. H. Malik, L. Erasmus, J. Pretorius","doi":"10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A description is provided on how good systems engineering processes and methods are used so that gaps can be determined by quantitative methods for informing training programs. The Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM) is used to determine how good systems engineering methods and processes are performed implicitly and explicitly as well as indicating the gaps. This study focuses on the systems engineering methods currently being used within one of the engineering business unit at a research council. Gaps between the current practices in competency areas are identified for consideration of possible interventions. Qualitative method where empirical data was collected through interviews and transcribed, is processed with an appropriate qualitative tool. This research shows that the Integrative Competency Area (ICA) knows the processes and use them well. In the Technical Competency Areas (TCA) some people use it implicitly, while others do not know about it. There is a general request for making processes, templates more readily available for people to use inside the organization. This research shows the gaps that can be addressed through the designing of training programs within the organization. This research could be extended to study other areas within the science council as well as other organizations.","PeriodicalId":193013,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","volume":"123 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative exploration into the application of Systems Engineering within a South African science council\",\"authors\":\"H. H. Malik, L. Erasmus, J. Pretorius\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A description is provided on how good systems engineering processes and methods are used so that gaps can be determined by quantitative methods for informing training programs. The Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM) is used to determine how good systems engineering methods and processes are performed implicitly and explicitly as well as indicating the gaps. This study focuses on the systems engineering methods currently being used within one of the engineering business unit at a research council. Gaps between the current practices in competency areas are identified for consideration of possible interventions. Qualitative method where empirical data was collected through interviews and transcribed, is processed with an appropriate qualitative tool. This research shows that the Integrative Competency Area (ICA) knows the processes and use them well. In the Technical Competency Areas (TCA) some people use it implicitly, while others do not know about it. There is a general request for making processes, templates more readily available for people to use inside the organization. This research shows the gaps that can be addressed through the designing of training programs within the organization. This research could be extended to study other areas within the science council as well as other organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"volume\":\"123 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

提供了一个关于如何使用好的系统工程过程和方法的描述,以便可以通过通知培训计划的定量方法来确定差距。系统工程能力模型(SECM)用于确定隐式和显式执行系统工程方法和过程的好坏,并指出差距。本研究的重点是系统工程方法,目前正在一个研究委员会的工程业务单位内使用。识别能力领域当前实践之间的差距,以考虑可能的干预措施。定性方法是通过访谈和转录收集经验数据,用适当的定性工具进行处理。本研究表明,综合胜任力域(ICA)了解流程并能很好地运用流程。在技术能力领域(TCA)中,一些人含蓄地使用它,而另一些人则不知道它。有一种普遍的要求是使流程和模板更容易为人们在组织内使用。这项研究表明,差距可以通过组织内部培训计划的设计来解决。这项研究可以扩展到科学委员会和其他组织的其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative exploration into the application of Systems Engineering within a South African science council
A description is provided on how good systems engineering processes and methods are used so that gaps can be determined by quantitative methods for informing training programs. The Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM) is used to determine how good systems engineering methods and processes are performed implicitly and explicitly as well as indicating the gaps. This study focuses on the systems engineering methods currently being used within one of the engineering business unit at a research council. Gaps between the current practices in competency areas are identified for consideration of possible interventions. Qualitative method where empirical data was collected through interviews and transcribed, is processed with an appropriate qualitative tool. This research shows that the Integrative Competency Area (ICA) knows the processes and use them well. In the Technical Competency Areas (TCA) some people use it implicitly, while others do not know about it. There is a general request for making processes, templates more readily available for people to use inside the organization. This research shows the gaps that can be addressed through the designing of training programs within the organization. This research could be extended to study other areas within the science council as well as other organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信