方法设计:现代设计教育的悖论

Jessica Helfand
{"title":"方法设计:现代设计教育的悖论","authors":"Jessica Helfand","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/11955.003.0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"graphic design.A newly engaged form of critical practice is necessary, one that is no longer concerned with originality as defined by personal expression, but rather one dedicated to an inventive contextuality.We also need to imagine a historical language of design that transcends styles and is embedded in the continuity of discourse.The point is not to invent a neomodernist avant-garde and inherit all of its problems. Rather the purpose is to stake a claim for autonomy, which, like an avant-garde, is already a separation from the social demands that limit graphic design to its most marketable features. Autonomy also gives coherency to graphic design in order to resist the dispersal it currently suffers by defining the conditions and terms in which it seeks to operate. Most importantly, a space of autonomy for graphic design affords an opportunity to engage in a more critical examination of its practice, assuming that it does not lapse into a convenient formalism or cannot escape the ideology of expressionism.","PeriodicalId":117237,"journal":{"name":"Culture Is Not Always Popular","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method Designing: The Paradox of Modern Design Education\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Helfand\",\"doi\":\"10.7551/mitpress/11955.003.0061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"graphic design.A newly engaged form of critical practice is necessary, one that is no longer concerned with originality as defined by personal expression, but rather one dedicated to an inventive contextuality.We also need to imagine a historical language of design that transcends styles and is embedded in the continuity of discourse.The point is not to invent a neomodernist avant-garde and inherit all of its problems. Rather the purpose is to stake a claim for autonomy, which, like an avant-garde, is already a separation from the social demands that limit graphic design to its most marketable features. Autonomy also gives coherency to graphic design in order to resist the dispersal it currently suffers by defining the conditions and terms in which it seeks to operate. Most importantly, a space of autonomy for graphic design affords an opportunity to engage in a more critical examination of its practice, assuming that it does not lapse into a convenient formalism or cannot escape the ideology of expressionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Is Not Always Popular\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Is Not Always Popular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11955.003.0061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Is Not Always Popular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11955.003.0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

平面设计。一种新的批判性实践形式是必要的,这种形式不再关注个人表达所定义的独创性,而是致力于创造性的情境。我们还需要想象一种超越风格的历史设计语言,并嵌入到话语的连续性中。问题的关键不是发明一个新现代主义先锋派,然后继承它的所有问题。相反,其目的是要求自主,这就像前卫艺术一样,已经脱离了将平面设计限制在其最具市场特征的社会需求。自治也给平面设计提供了连贯性,通过定义它寻求运作的条件和条款,以抵制它目前所遭受的分散。最重要的是,平面设计的自主空间为其实践提供了一个更批判性的检查机会,假设它不会陷入方便的形式主义或无法逃脱表现主义的意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Method Designing: The Paradox of Modern Design Education
graphic design.A newly engaged form of critical practice is necessary, one that is no longer concerned with originality as defined by personal expression, but rather one dedicated to an inventive contextuality.We also need to imagine a historical language of design that transcends styles and is embedded in the continuity of discourse.The point is not to invent a neomodernist avant-garde and inherit all of its problems. Rather the purpose is to stake a claim for autonomy, which, like an avant-garde, is already a separation from the social demands that limit graphic design to its most marketable features. Autonomy also gives coherency to graphic design in order to resist the dispersal it currently suffers by defining the conditions and terms in which it seeks to operate. Most importantly, a space of autonomy for graphic design affords an opportunity to engage in a more critical examination of its practice, assuming that it does not lapse into a convenient formalism or cannot escape the ideology of expressionism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信