{"title":"SKY PLC诉SKYKICK UK LTD","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade Marks – European trade marks – SKY – Validity – Specification of goods and services – Broad specifications – “Computer software” – Requirement of clarity and precision – Whether a ground of invalidity – Whether amounting to failure to satisfy requirement of graphical representability – Whether contrary to the public interest – Bad faith – Effect of lack of intention to use in whole or in part – Vires of s. 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 – Reference to Court of Justice","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SKY PLC v SKYKICK UK LTD\",\"authors\":\"Chancery Division\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpc/rcy022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n H1 Trade Marks – European trade marks – SKY – Validity – Specification of goods and services – Broad specifications – “Computer software” – Requirement of clarity and precision – Whether a ground of invalidity – Whether amounting to failure to satisfy requirement of graphical representability – Whether contrary to the public interest – Bad faith – Effect of lack of intention to use in whole or in part – Vires of s. 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 – Reference to Court of Justice\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
H1 Trade Marks – European trade marks – SKY – Validity – Specification of goods and services – Broad specifications – “Computer software” – Requirement of clarity and precision – Whether a ground of invalidity – Whether amounting to failure to satisfy requirement of graphical representability – Whether contrary to the public interest – Bad faith – Effect of lack of intention to use in whole or in part – Vires of s. 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 – Reference to Court of Justice
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
