无追索权贷款的期权价值与资产价格膨胀

Andrey Pavlov, Susan M. Wachter
{"title":"无追索权贷款的期权价值与资产价格膨胀","authors":"Andrey Pavlov, Susan M. Wachter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.302939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the market prices of assets in fixed supply whose purchase is typically financed through non-recourse loans. The largest and most common asset in this category is real estate. We demonstrate the following two important features of such markets: - Lenders' underpricing of the put option contained in the non-recourse loans leads to inflated asset prices within efficient markets, and - Under certain conditions, the presence of short-term players in the debt market induces all lenders to underprice the put option in equilibrium. We further show that the probability of entering the \"underpricing\" equilibrium (i.e., all lenders underprice the put) increases with the time since the last negative demand shock, increases with the volatility of the asset market, and decreases with the size of the debt market. These results hold even when all participants in both equity and debt markets are fully rational. Furthermore, the model allows for management compensation that is aligned with maximizing bank shareholders' value. Using real estate transaction data we find strong empirical support for the predictions of the model.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Option Value of Non-Recourse Lending and Inflated Asset Prices\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Pavlov, Susan M. Wachter\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.302939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the market prices of assets in fixed supply whose purchase is typically financed through non-recourse loans. The largest and most common asset in this category is real estate. We demonstrate the following two important features of such markets: - Lenders' underpricing of the put option contained in the non-recourse loans leads to inflated asset prices within efficient markets, and - Under certain conditions, the presence of short-term players in the debt market induces all lenders to underprice the put option in equilibrium. We further show that the probability of entering the \\\"underpricing\\\" equilibrium (i.e., all lenders underprice the put) increases with the time since the last negative demand shock, increases with the volatility of the asset market, and decreases with the size of the debt market. These results hold even when all participants in both equity and debt markets are fully rational. Furthermore, the model allows for management compensation that is aligned with maximizing bank shareholders' value. Using real estate transaction data we find strong empirical support for the predictions of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们研究固定供给资产的市场价格,这些资产的购买通常是通过无追索权贷款融资的。这类资产中最大和最常见的是房地产。我们证明了这类市场的以下两个重要特征:贷款人对无追索权贷款中包含的看跌期权定价过低,导致有效市场内资产价格膨胀;在某些条件下,债务市场中短期参与者的存在导致所有贷款人在均衡状态下低估看跌期权的价格。我们进一步表明,进入“定价过低”均衡(即所有出借人都低估看跌期权)的概率随着上一次负需求冲击后的时间而增加,随着资产市场的波动性而增加,并随着债务市场的规模而减少。即使股票和债券市场的所有参与者都完全理性,这些结果也成立。此外,该模型允许与最大化银行股东价值相一致的管理层薪酬。利用房地产交易数据,我们发现了对模型预测的强有力的经验支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Option Value of Non-Recourse Lending and Inflated Asset Prices
We investigate the market prices of assets in fixed supply whose purchase is typically financed through non-recourse loans. The largest and most common asset in this category is real estate. We demonstrate the following two important features of such markets: - Lenders' underpricing of the put option contained in the non-recourse loans leads to inflated asset prices within efficient markets, and - Under certain conditions, the presence of short-term players in the debt market induces all lenders to underprice the put option in equilibrium. We further show that the probability of entering the "underpricing" equilibrium (i.e., all lenders underprice the put) increases with the time since the last negative demand shock, increases with the volatility of the asset market, and decreases with the size of the debt market. These results hold even when all participants in both equity and debt markets are fully rational. Furthermore, the model allows for management compensation that is aligned with maximizing bank shareholders' value. Using real estate transaction data we find strong empirical support for the predictions of the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信