策略证明电子市场

A. Dani, A. K. Pujari, V. Gulati
{"title":"策略证明电子市场","authors":"A. Dani, A. K. Pujari, V. Gulati","doi":"10.1145/1282100.1282110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In electronic double auctions, property of incentive compatibility is very important. Incentive compatibility ensures that truthful bidding is the dominant strategy. Other important properties in electronic auctions are budget balance (BB) and individual rational (IR). The former ensures that the auction does not run in loss whereas the latter ensures voluntary participation. However these can be achieved only after sacrificing efficiency. The mechanisms based on uniform clearing price have been proposed in literature. Such mechanisms satisfy the properties of BB and IR. They are incentive compatible. However uniform price auction mechanism suffers from the problem of demand shading. Due to demand reduction, agents can acquire units at a lower price. This affects the property of incentive compatibility. Another problem with this approach is that it is not false name proof, meaning that agents can submit bids under different names to improve their utility. In electronic markets, where bids and asks are submitted remotely this property is very important. In this paper we propose discriminatory price mechanism, which is strategy proof, individually rational and budget balance. It is also false name proof, meaning agents cannot improve their utility by submitting false name bids.","PeriodicalId":262638,"journal":{"name":"Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy proof electronic markets\",\"authors\":\"A. Dani, A. K. Pujari, V. Gulati\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1282100.1282110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In electronic double auctions, property of incentive compatibility is very important. Incentive compatibility ensures that truthful bidding is the dominant strategy. Other important properties in electronic auctions are budget balance (BB) and individual rational (IR). The former ensures that the auction does not run in loss whereas the latter ensures voluntary participation. However these can be achieved only after sacrificing efficiency. The mechanisms based on uniform clearing price have been proposed in literature. Such mechanisms satisfy the properties of BB and IR. They are incentive compatible. However uniform price auction mechanism suffers from the problem of demand shading. Due to demand reduction, agents can acquire units at a lower price. This affects the property of incentive compatibility. Another problem with this approach is that it is not false name proof, meaning that agents can submit bids under different names to improve their utility. In electronic markets, where bids and asks are submitted remotely this property is very important. In this paper we propose discriminatory price mechanism, which is strategy proof, individually rational and budget balance. It is also false name proof, meaning agents cannot improve their utility by submitting false name bids.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1282100.1282110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1282100.1282110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在电子双重拍卖中,激励相容的性质是非常重要的。激励相容保证了诚实投标是主导策略。电子拍卖的其他重要属性是预算平衡(BB)和个人理性(IR)。前者确保拍卖不会亏损,而后者确保自愿参与。然而,这些只有在牺牲效率之后才能实现。基于统一结算价格的机制已在文献中提出。这种机理满足BB和IR的性质。它们是激励相容的。但统一价格拍卖机制存在需求阴影问题。由于需求减少,代理商可以以更低的价格获得单位。这影响了激励相容性的性质。这种方法的另一个问题是,它不是假名证明,这意味着代理可以用不同的名字提交投标,以提高他们的效用。在电子市场中,出价和要价都是远程提交的,这一特性非常重要。本文提出了具有策略证明、个体理性和预算平衡的歧视性价格机制。这也是假名证明,这意味着代理人不能通过提交假名投标来提高他们的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy proof electronic markets
In electronic double auctions, property of incentive compatibility is very important. Incentive compatibility ensures that truthful bidding is the dominant strategy. Other important properties in electronic auctions are budget balance (BB) and individual rational (IR). The former ensures that the auction does not run in loss whereas the latter ensures voluntary participation. However these can be achieved only after sacrificing efficiency. The mechanisms based on uniform clearing price have been proposed in literature. Such mechanisms satisfy the properties of BB and IR. They are incentive compatible. However uniform price auction mechanism suffers from the problem of demand shading. Due to demand reduction, agents can acquire units at a lower price. This affects the property of incentive compatibility. Another problem with this approach is that it is not false name proof, meaning that agents can submit bids under different names to improve their utility. In electronic markets, where bids and asks are submitted remotely this property is very important. In this paper we propose discriminatory price mechanism, which is strategy proof, individually rational and budget balance. It is also false name proof, meaning agents cannot improve their utility by submitting false name bids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信