通过利润最大化的资源分配策略挤出云

M. Mazzucco, Martti Vasar, M. Dumas
{"title":"通过利润最大化的资源分配策略挤出云","authors":"M. Mazzucco, Martti Vasar, M. Dumas","doi":"10.1109/MASCOTS.2012.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the problem of maximizing the average hourly profit earned by a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider who runs a software service on behalf of a customer using servers rented from an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider. The SaaS provider earns a fee per successful transaction and incurs costs pro-portional to the number of server-hours it uses. A number of resource allocation policies for this or similar problems have been proposed in previous work. However, to the best of our knowledge, these policies have not been comparatively evaluated in a cloud environment. This paper reports on an empirical evaluation of three policies using a replica of Wikipedia deployed on the Amazon EC2 cloud. Experimental results show that a policy based on a solution to an optimization problem derived from the SaaS provider's utility function outperforms well-known heuristics that have been proposed for similar problems. It is also shown that all three policies outperform a \"reactive\" allocation approach based on Amazon's auto-scaling feature.","PeriodicalId":278764,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Squeezing Out the Cloud via Profit-Maximizing Resource Allocation Policies\",\"authors\":\"M. Mazzucco, Martti Vasar, M. Dumas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MASCOTS.2012.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the problem of maximizing the average hourly profit earned by a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider who runs a software service on behalf of a customer using servers rented from an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider. The SaaS provider earns a fee per successful transaction and incurs costs pro-portional to the number of server-hours it uses. A number of resource allocation policies for this or similar problems have been proposed in previous work. However, to the best of our knowledge, these policies have not been comparatively evaluated in a cloud environment. This paper reports on an empirical evaluation of three policies using a replica of Wikipedia deployed on the Amazon EC2 cloud. Experimental results show that a policy based on a solution to an optimization problem derived from the SaaS provider's utility function outperforms well-known heuristics that have been proposed for similar problems. It is also shown that all three policies outperform a \\\"reactive\\\" allocation approach based on Amazon's auto-scaling feature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2012.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2012.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

我们研究了软件即服务(SaaS)提供商的平均小时利润最大化问题,SaaS提供商使用从基础设施即服务(IaaS)提供商租用的服务器,代表客户运行软件服务。SaaS提供商从每个成功的交易中赚取费用,并根据其使用的服务器小时数产生相应的成本。在以前的工作中已经提出了一些针对这个或类似问题的资源分配政策。然而,据我们所知,这些策略还没有在云环境中进行比较评估。本文报告了使用部署在Amazon EC2云上的维基百科副本对三个策略的实证评估。实验结果表明,基于SaaS提供商效用函数衍生的优化问题的解决方案的策略优于针对类似问题提出的众所周知的启发式方法。研究还表明,这三种策略都优于基于Amazon自动缩放功能的“响应式”分配方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Squeezing Out the Cloud via Profit-Maximizing Resource Allocation Policies
We study the problem of maximizing the average hourly profit earned by a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider who runs a software service on behalf of a customer using servers rented from an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider. The SaaS provider earns a fee per successful transaction and incurs costs pro-portional to the number of server-hours it uses. A number of resource allocation policies for this or similar problems have been proposed in previous work. However, to the best of our knowledge, these policies have not been comparatively evaluated in a cloud environment. This paper reports on an empirical evaluation of three policies using a replica of Wikipedia deployed on the Amazon EC2 cloud. Experimental results show that a policy based on a solution to an optimization problem derived from the SaaS provider's utility function outperforms well-known heuristics that have been proposed for similar problems. It is also shown that all three policies outperform a "reactive" allocation approach based on Amazon's auto-scaling feature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信