{"title":"一种在层次分析法中检测和消除无意识判断偏差(UJB)的估计程序","authors":"G. C. Mcmeekin","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1994.379924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an estimation procedure to detect and to remove unintentional judgmental bias (UJB) in the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology for multicriteria decision making (MCDM). UJB reflects a \"cyclical hierarchy\" because of the existence of a structural dependence of alternatives on criteria. This violates the principle of hierarchic composition embodied in the AHP method. The judgment data for comparing the different sources of risk are susceptible to the \"framing effect\" bias. The reference AHP and the supermatrix approach can be used to detect for the presence of UJB in the original AHP data. The estimation and removal of UJB can be achieved by an L2 norm estimation procedure using the Stein estimator. This involves use of the generalized inverse theory and methodology. The feedback data matrices provide a \"dual\" formulation for the original AHP hierarchy. The supermatrix approach is based on a stationary Markov system involving the feedback matrix and the original AHP matrix local priorities at each level of the hierarchy. Once the original AHP judgment data has been revised to remove the UJB influence, it can then be used to provide the correct AHP sensitivity analysis.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":200747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference - IEMC '94","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An estimation procedure to detect and remove unintentional judgemental bias (UJB) in the analytic hierarchy process methodology\",\"authors\":\"G. C. Mcmeekin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.1994.379924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an estimation procedure to detect and to remove unintentional judgmental bias (UJB) in the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology for multicriteria decision making (MCDM). UJB reflects a \\\"cyclical hierarchy\\\" because of the existence of a structural dependence of alternatives on criteria. This violates the principle of hierarchic composition embodied in the AHP method. The judgment data for comparing the different sources of risk are susceptible to the \\\"framing effect\\\" bias. The reference AHP and the supermatrix approach can be used to detect for the presence of UJB in the original AHP data. The estimation and removal of UJB can be achieved by an L2 norm estimation procedure using the Stein estimator. This involves use of the generalized inverse theory and methodology. The feedback data matrices provide a \\\"dual\\\" formulation for the original AHP hierarchy. The supermatrix approach is based on a stationary Markov system involving the feedback matrix and the original AHP matrix local priorities at each level of the hierarchy. Once the original AHP judgment data has been revised to remove the UJB influence, it can then be used to provide the correct AHP sensitivity analysis.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":200747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference - IEMC '94\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference - IEMC '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1994.379924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference - IEMC '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1994.379924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An estimation procedure to detect and remove unintentional judgemental bias (UJB) in the analytic hierarchy process methodology
This paper provides an estimation procedure to detect and to remove unintentional judgmental bias (UJB) in the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology for multicriteria decision making (MCDM). UJB reflects a "cyclical hierarchy" because of the existence of a structural dependence of alternatives on criteria. This violates the principle of hierarchic composition embodied in the AHP method. The judgment data for comparing the different sources of risk are susceptible to the "framing effect" bias. The reference AHP and the supermatrix approach can be used to detect for the presence of UJB in the original AHP data. The estimation and removal of UJB can be achieved by an L2 norm estimation procedure using the Stein estimator. This involves use of the generalized inverse theory and methodology. The feedback data matrices provide a "dual" formulation for the original AHP hierarchy. The supermatrix approach is based on a stationary Markov system involving the feedback matrix and the original AHP matrix local priorities at each level of the hierarchy. Once the original AHP judgment data has been revised to remove the UJB influence, it can then be used to provide the correct AHP sensitivity analysis.<>