塞万提斯与体裁

B. Brewer
{"title":"塞万提斯与体裁","authors":"B. Brewer","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198742913.013.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Don Quixote I.47 and 48, Cervantes sets out his most sustained exposition of literary theory. This chapter points out that the dialogue staged in these chapters between the canon from Toledo and the priest from Don Quixote’s village contains in embryonic form the primary tensions that infuse Cervantes’s attitude toward literary genre as revealed in his fiction. The critical exchange is divided into two parts: the canon’s critique of the romances of chivalry that have caused Don Quixote’s insanity, and the priest’s appraisal of the state of contemporary popular theatre. In both cases, which are complementary, the characters’ criticisms are harsh without being completely uncompromising. Also, in both cases, the artistic precepts expounded accurately describe Cervantes’s actual practice of composing literary fiction, with the non-trivial caveat that they also contain important limitations.","PeriodicalId":377875,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Cervantes","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervantes and Genre\",\"authors\":\"B. Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198742913.013.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Don Quixote I.47 and 48, Cervantes sets out his most sustained exposition of literary theory. This chapter points out that the dialogue staged in these chapters between the canon from Toledo and the priest from Don Quixote’s village contains in embryonic form the primary tensions that infuse Cervantes’s attitude toward literary genre as revealed in his fiction. The critical exchange is divided into two parts: the canon’s critique of the romances of chivalry that have caused Don Quixote’s insanity, and the priest’s appraisal of the state of contemporary popular theatre. In both cases, which are complementary, the characters’ criticisms are harsh without being completely uncompromising. Also, in both cases, the artistic precepts expounded accurately describe Cervantes’s actual practice of composing literary fiction, with the non-trivial caveat that they also contain important limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Cervantes\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Cervantes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198742913.013.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Cervantes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198742913.013.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《堂吉诃德》I.47和48中,塞万提斯对文学理论进行了最持久的阐述。这一章指出在这些章节中展开的对话在托莱多的牧师和堂吉诃德所在村庄的牧师之间包含了初步的紧张关系这些紧张关系注入了塞万提斯对文学体裁的态度就像他的小说中揭示的那样。批判的交流分为两部分:教长对骑士文学的批判导致了堂吉诃德的精神错乱,以及牧师对当代流行戏剧状态的评价。在这两种情况下,这是互补的,角色的批评是严厉的,但不是完全不妥协。而且,在这两种情况下,所阐述的艺术戒律准确地描述了塞万提斯创作文学小说的实际做法,但也有重要的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervantes and Genre
In Don Quixote I.47 and 48, Cervantes sets out his most sustained exposition of literary theory. This chapter points out that the dialogue staged in these chapters between the canon from Toledo and the priest from Don Quixote’s village contains in embryonic form the primary tensions that infuse Cervantes’s attitude toward literary genre as revealed in his fiction. The critical exchange is divided into two parts: the canon’s critique of the romances of chivalry that have caused Don Quixote’s insanity, and the priest’s appraisal of the state of contemporary popular theatre. In both cases, which are complementary, the characters’ criticisms are harsh without being completely uncompromising. Also, in both cases, the artistic precepts expounded accurately describe Cervantes’s actual practice of composing literary fiction, with the non-trivial caveat that they also contain important limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信