信息披露的战略复杂性

Cyrus Aghamolla, Kevin C. Smith
{"title":"信息披露的战略复杂性","authors":"Cyrus Aghamolla, Kevin C. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3936805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive evidence suggests that managers strategically choose the complexity of their descriptive disclosures. However, their motives in doing so appear mixed, as complex disclosures are used to obfuscate in some cases and as a means of informative communication in others. Building on these observations, we first identify a novel stylized fact: disclosure complexity is non-monotonic in firm performance. We then develop a model of disclosure complexity that incorporates the dual roles of complexity and can explain this stylized fact. In the model, a manager discloses to investors of heterogeneous sophistication and can adjust the complexity of the disclosure to either provide more precise information or to obfuscate. In equilibrium, the manager issues a complex disclosure upon observing both highly positive and negative news. The average market reaction to complex disclosures may exceed that to simple disclosures, which is at odds with the conventional wisdom that negative news is more often complexified. We further demonstrate a policy solution to mitigate the harmful effects of obfuscation on the information environment: mandate that firms accompany complex disclosures with simplified reports.","PeriodicalId":192050,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Accounting eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Complexity in Disclosure\",\"authors\":\"Cyrus Aghamolla, Kevin C. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3936805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extensive evidence suggests that managers strategically choose the complexity of their descriptive disclosures. However, their motives in doing so appear mixed, as complex disclosures are used to obfuscate in some cases and as a means of informative communication in others. Building on these observations, we first identify a novel stylized fact: disclosure complexity is non-monotonic in firm performance. We then develop a model of disclosure complexity that incorporates the dual roles of complexity and can explain this stylized fact. In the model, a manager discloses to investors of heterogeneous sophistication and can adjust the complexity of the disclosure to either provide more precise information or to obfuscate. In equilibrium, the manager issues a complex disclosure upon observing both highly positive and negative news. The average market reaction to complex disclosures may exceed that to simple disclosures, which is at odds with the conventional wisdom that negative news is more often complexified. We further demonstrate a policy solution to mitigate the harmful effects of obfuscation on the information environment: mandate that firms accompany complex disclosures with simplified reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance & Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance & Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3936805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3936805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

大量证据表明,管理者会战略性地选择描述性信息披露的复杂性。然而,他们这样做的动机似乎是复杂的,因为复杂的披露在某些情况下被用来混淆视听,而在另一些情况下被用作信息交流的手段。在这些观察的基础上,我们首先确定了一个新的程式化事实:披露复杂性在公司绩效中是非单调的。然后,我们开发了一个披露复杂性的模型,该模型结合了复杂性的双重角色,并可以解释这种程式化的事实。在该模型中,管理者向复杂程度各异的投资者披露信息,并可以调整披露的复杂程度,以提供更精确的信息或使信息模糊。在均衡状态下,管理者在观察到高度正面和负面的消息时,都会发布复杂的信息披露。市场对复杂信息披露的平均反应可能会超过对简单信息披露的反应,这与负面新闻往往更复杂的传统观点相左。我们进一步展示了一种政策解决方案,以减轻信息混淆对信息环境的有害影响:强制要求公司在复杂的披露中附带简化的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Complexity in Disclosure
Extensive evidence suggests that managers strategically choose the complexity of their descriptive disclosures. However, their motives in doing so appear mixed, as complex disclosures are used to obfuscate in some cases and as a means of informative communication in others. Building on these observations, we first identify a novel stylized fact: disclosure complexity is non-monotonic in firm performance. We then develop a model of disclosure complexity that incorporates the dual roles of complexity and can explain this stylized fact. In the model, a manager discloses to investors of heterogeneous sophistication and can adjust the complexity of the disclosure to either provide more precise information or to obfuscate. In equilibrium, the manager issues a complex disclosure upon observing both highly positive and negative news. The average market reaction to complex disclosures may exceed that to simple disclosures, which is at odds with the conventional wisdom that negative news is more often complexified. We further demonstrate a policy solution to mitigate the harmful effects of obfuscation on the information environment: mandate that firms accompany complex disclosures with simplified reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信