基于长短期记忆法的致密气藏产量预测

Afrah Qoqandi, Omar Alfaleh, M. Ramadan, Uchenna Odi
{"title":"基于长短期记忆法的致密气藏产量预测","authors":"Afrah Qoqandi, Omar Alfaleh, M. Ramadan, Uchenna Odi","doi":"10.2118/213343-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Forecasting the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for extremely tight gas sites with long-term transient behaviors is not an easy task. Because older, more established methods used to predict wells with these characteristics have shown important limitations, researchers have relied on new techniques, like long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning methods. This study assesses the performance of LSTM estimations, compared to that of a physics-based reservoir simulation process.\n With the goal of obtaining reliable EUR forecasts, unconventional tight gas reservoir data is generated via simulation and analyzed with LSTM deep learning techniques, tailored for sequential data. Simultaneously, a reservoir simulation model that is based on the same data is generated for comparison purposes. The LSTM forecasting model has the added benefit of considering operational interventions in the well, so that the machine learning (ML) framework is not disrupted by interferences that do not reflect the actual physics of the production mechanism on well behavior.\n The comparison of the data-driven LSTM deep learning model and the physics-based reservoir simulation model estimations was performed using the latter framework as a benchmark. Findings show that the AI-assisted LSTM model provides predictions similarly accurate to the ones estimated by the physics-based reservoir model, but with the added capability for long-term forecasting. These data-driven EUR models show great promise when analyzing unusually tight gas reservoirs that feature time series well information, which can improve estimations about recovery and point engineers towards better decisions regarding the future of reservoirs. Therefore, exploring deep learning methods featuring varying types of artificial neural networks in greater detail has the potential to significantly benefit the oil and gas sector.\n When compared to other machine learning methods, novel deep learning techniques have advantages that remain underexplored in the literature. This paper helps fill this gap by providing a valuable comparison between older prediction methods and new estimation simulations based on neural networks that can predict long-term behaviors.","PeriodicalId":249245,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production Forecasting in Tight Gas Reservoirs Using Long Short-Term Memory Methods (LSTM)\",\"authors\":\"Afrah Qoqandi, Omar Alfaleh, M. Ramadan, Uchenna Odi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/213343-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Forecasting the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for extremely tight gas sites with long-term transient behaviors is not an easy task. Because older, more established methods used to predict wells with these characteristics have shown important limitations, researchers have relied on new techniques, like long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning methods. This study assesses the performance of LSTM estimations, compared to that of a physics-based reservoir simulation process.\\n With the goal of obtaining reliable EUR forecasts, unconventional tight gas reservoir data is generated via simulation and analyzed with LSTM deep learning techniques, tailored for sequential data. Simultaneously, a reservoir simulation model that is based on the same data is generated for comparison purposes. The LSTM forecasting model has the added benefit of considering operational interventions in the well, so that the machine learning (ML) framework is not disrupted by interferences that do not reflect the actual physics of the production mechanism on well behavior.\\n The comparison of the data-driven LSTM deep learning model and the physics-based reservoir simulation model estimations was performed using the latter framework as a benchmark. Findings show that the AI-assisted LSTM model provides predictions similarly accurate to the ones estimated by the physics-based reservoir model, but with the added capability for long-term forecasting. These data-driven EUR models show great promise when analyzing unusually tight gas reservoirs that feature time series well information, which can improve estimations about recovery and point engineers towards better decisions regarding the future of reservoirs. Therefore, exploring deep learning methods featuring varying types of artificial neural networks in greater detail has the potential to significantly benefit the oil and gas sector.\\n When compared to other machine learning methods, novel deep learning techniques have advantages that remain underexplored in the literature. This paper helps fill this gap by providing a valuable comparison between older prediction methods and new estimation simulations based on neural networks that can predict long-term behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/213343-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213343-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测具有长期瞬态特性的极致密气藏的估计最终采收率(EUR)并不是一件容易的事情。由于较老的、更成熟的预测具有这些特征的井的方法显示出重要的局限性,研究人员依赖于新技术,如长短期记忆(LSTM)深度学习方法。与基于物理的油藏模拟过程相比,本研究评估了LSTM估计的性能。为了获得可靠的EUR预测,通过模拟生成非常规致密气藏数据,并使用针对序列数据定制的LSTM深度学习技术进行分析。同时,基于相同数据生成油藏模拟模型以进行比较。LSTM预测模型还有一个额外的好处,即考虑了井中的操作干预,因此机器学习(ML)框架不会受到不能反映生产机制对井行为的实际物理影响的干扰。以数据驱动的LSTM深度学习模型和基于物理的储层模拟模型为基准,进行了对比。研究结果表明,人工智能辅助的LSTM模型提供的预测结果与基于物理油藏模型的预测结果相似,但增加了长期预测的能力。这些数据驱动的EUR模型在分析具有时间序列井信息的异常致密气藏时显示出很大的前景,可以提高对采收率的估计,并为工程师提供有关储层未来的更好决策。因此,更详细地探索具有不同类型人工神经网络的深度学习方法,有可能为石油和天然气行业带来巨大收益。与其他机器学习方法相比,新颖的深度学习技术具有文献中尚未充分探索的优势。本文通过在旧的预测方法和新的基于神经网络的预测模拟之间提供有价值的比较来填补这一空白,这些方法可以预测长期行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Production Forecasting in Tight Gas Reservoirs Using Long Short-Term Memory Methods (LSTM)
Forecasting the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for extremely tight gas sites with long-term transient behaviors is not an easy task. Because older, more established methods used to predict wells with these characteristics have shown important limitations, researchers have relied on new techniques, like long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning methods. This study assesses the performance of LSTM estimations, compared to that of a physics-based reservoir simulation process. With the goal of obtaining reliable EUR forecasts, unconventional tight gas reservoir data is generated via simulation and analyzed with LSTM deep learning techniques, tailored for sequential data. Simultaneously, a reservoir simulation model that is based on the same data is generated for comparison purposes. The LSTM forecasting model has the added benefit of considering operational interventions in the well, so that the machine learning (ML) framework is not disrupted by interferences that do not reflect the actual physics of the production mechanism on well behavior. The comparison of the data-driven LSTM deep learning model and the physics-based reservoir simulation model estimations was performed using the latter framework as a benchmark. Findings show that the AI-assisted LSTM model provides predictions similarly accurate to the ones estimated by the physics-based reservoir model, but with the added capability for long-term forecasting. These data-driven EUR models show great promise when analyzing unusually tight gas reservoirs that feature time series well information, which can improve estimations about recovery and point engineers towards better decisions regarding the future of reservoirs. Therefore, exploring deep learning methods featuring varying types of artificial neural networks in greater detail has the potential to significantly benefit the oil and gas sector. When compared to other machine learning methods, novel deep learning techniques have advantages that remain underexplored in the literature. This paper helps fill this gap by providing a valuable comparison between older prediction methods and new estimation simulations based on neural networks that can predict long-term behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信