{"title":"谁在建筑和城市设计项目中进行合作和创新?","authors":"G. Lizarralde, L. Viel, M. Bourgault, N. Drouin","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2012.6297685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that collaboration and innovation (C&I) do not occur naturally in all organizations. In response, most organizations designate an internal person or unit or an external consultant or outsource to act as a C&I champion, responsible for fostering integration, facilitating communication, exchanging information, and creating the conditions for alternative solutions to emerge. C&I champions have been largely documented in projects conducted within organizations. However, architecture and urban design projects are not usually conducted by a single organization, but instead by a complex, temporary group of heterogeneous organizations called a temporary multiorganization (TMO). What sorts of C&I champions contribute to these complex TMOs? How do they operate? Based on case studies of recent architecture and urban design projects conducted in Canada, we propose a typology of actors that foster C&I in this sector. Seven types of C&I champions are identified, and the differences between them are described and analyzed. The results provide a useful management framework for architecture and urban planning professionals, who are often unaware of the high C&I potential in an industry that is largely regarded as conflict-prone and innovation-adverse.","PeriodicalId":219998,"journal":{"name":"2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who collaborates and innovates in architecture and urban design projects?\",\"authors\":\"G. Lizarralde, L. Viel, M. Bourgault, N. Drouin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICE.2012.6297685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely known that collaboration and innovation (C&I) do not occur naturally in all organizations. In response, most organizations designate an internal person or unit or an external consultant or outsource to act as a C&I champion, responsible for fostering integration, facilitating communication, exchanging information, and creating the conditions for alternative solutions to emerge. C&I champions have been largely documented in projects conducted within organizations. However, architecture and urban design projects are not usually conducted by a single organization, but instead by a complex, temporary group of heterogeneous organizations called a temporary multiorganization (TMO). What sorts of C&I champions contribute to these complex TMOs? How do they operate? Based on case studies of recent architecture and urban design projects conducted in Canada, we propose a typology of actors that foster C&I in this sector. Seven types of C&I champions are identified, and the differences between them are described and analyzed. The results provide a useful management framework for architecture and urban planning professionals, who are often unaware of the high C&I potential in an industry that is largely regarded as conflict-prone and innovation-adverse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"164 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Who collaborates and innovates in architecture and urban design projects?
It is widely known that collaboration and innovation (C&I) do not occur naturally in all organizations. In response, most organizations designate an internal person or unit or an external consultant or outsource to act as a C&I champion, responsible for fostering integration, facilitating communication, exchanging information, and creating the conditions for alternative solutions to emerge. C&I champions have been largely documented in projects conducted within organizations. However, architecture and urban design projects are not usually conducted by a single organization, but instead by a complex, temporary group of heterogeneous organizations called a temporary multiorganization (TMO). What sorts of C&I champions contribute to these complex TMOs? How do they operate? Based on case studies of recent architecture and urban design projects conducted in Canada, we propose a typology of actors that foster C&I in this sector. Seven types of C&I champions are identified, and the differences between them are described and analyzed. The results provide a useful management framework for architecture and urban planning professionals, who are often unaware of the high C&I potential in an industry that is largely regarded as conflict-prone and innovation-adverse.