哪些是研究生管理教学最有效的方法?- FEB学生对个别教学方法和教学方法的看法捆绑了有效性

Nina Pološki Vokić, A. Aleksić
{"title":"哪些是研究生管理教学最有效的方法?- FEB学生对个别教学方法和教学方法的看法捆绑了有效性","authors":"Nina Pološki Vokić, A. Aleksić","doi":"10.22598/ZEFZG.2018.1.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University lecturers reached the consensus that more outcome oriented and visual teaching is favoured by Generation Y. However, it is crucial to assess students’ perceptions about the effectiveness of various active and passive teaching methods, as their perceptions determine how students approach their learning, and as a result affect learning outcomes. In the theoretical part of the paper, previous empirical Þ ndings and conclusions about the effectiveness of different teaching methods (TM), as well as students’ preferences of teaching methods related to their generational membership and other demographic characteristics are reviewed. In the empirical part of the paper, the effectiveness of various teaching methods was assessed by 99 graduate program students in Management from the Faculty of Economics and Business Zagreb. Students’ perceptions are explored through a comprehensive list of 52 individual TM, as well as through TM bundles obtained through a factor analysis. As well, respondents’ perceptions were related to their demographic characteristics (gender, undergraduate and graduate grade point average (GPA), (relevant) work experience, and extracurricular engagement).","PeriodicalId":168418,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which are the most effective methods for teaching management at a graduate level? – FEB students’ perceptions of individual teaching methods and teaching method bundles effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Nina Pološki Vokić, A. Aleksić\",\"doi\":\"10.22598/ZEFZG.2018.1.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"University lecturers reached the consensus that more outcome oriented and visual teaching is favoured by Generation Y. However, it is crucial to assess students’ perceptions about the effectiveness of various active and passive teaching methods, as their perceptions determine how students approach their learning, and as a result affect learning outcomes. In the theoretical part of the paper, previous empirical Þ ndings and conclusions about the effectiveness of different teaching methods (TM), as well as students’ preferences of teaching methods related to their generational membership and other demographic characteristics are reviewed. In the empirical part of the paper, the effectiveness of various teaching methods was assessed by 99 graduate program students in Management from the Faculty of Economics and Business Zagreb. Students’ perceptions are explored through a comprehensive list of 52 individual TM, as well as through TM bundles obtained through a factor analysis. As well, respondents’ perceptions were related to their demographic characteristics (gender, undergraduate and graduate grade point average (GPA), (relevant) work experience, and extracurricular engagement).\",\"PeriodicalId\":168418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22598/ZEFZG.2018.1.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Ekonomskog fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/ZEFZG.2018.1.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大学讲师达成共识,更多的结果导向和视觉教学受到y一代的青睐。然而,评估学生对各种主动和被动教学方法有效性的看法是至关重要的,因为他们的看法决定了学生如何对待他们的学习,从而影响学习成果。在本文的理论部分,回顾了以往关于不同教学方法(TM)有效性的实证研究Þ结果和结论,以及学生对教学方法的偏好与他们的代际成员和其他人口统计学特征有关。在本文的实证部分,对来自萨格勒布经济与商业学院的99名管理学研究生进行了各种教学方法的有效性评估。通过52个TM个体的综合列表以及通过因子分析获得的TM束来探索学生的看法。此外,受访者的看法与他们的人口统计学特征(性别、本科和研究生的平均绩点(GPA)、(相关)工作经验和课外活动)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which are the most effective methods for teaching management at a graduate level? – FEB students’ perceptions of individual teaching methods and teaching method bundles effectiveness
University lecturers reached the consensus that more outcome oriented and visual teaching is favoured by Generation Y. However, it is crucial to assess students’ perceptions about the effectiveness of various active and passive teaching methods, as their perceptions determine how students approach their learning, and as a result affect learning outcomes. In the theoretical part of the paper, previous empirical Þ ndings and conclusions about the effectiveness of different teaching methods (TM), as well as students’ preferences of teaching methods related to their generational membership and other demographic characteristics are reviewed. In the empirical part of the paper, the effectiveness of various teaching methods was assessed by 99 graduate program students in Management from the Faculty of Economics and Business Zagreb. Students’ perceptions are explored through a comprehensive list of 52 individual TM, as well as through TM bundles obtained through a factor analysis. As well, respondents’ perceptions were related to their demographic characteristics (gender, undergraduate and graduate grade point average (GPA), (relevant) work experience, and extracurricular engagement).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信