在欧洲社会权利委员会决定的cgil诉意大利案中良心反对和获得堕胎的权利

S. D. Vido
{"title":"在欧洲社会权利委员会决定的cgil诉意大利案中良心反对和获得堕胎的权利","authors":"S. D. Vido","doi":"10.15057/30079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyse the decision rendered by the European Committee of Social Rights in the case CGIL v. Italy, published on 11 April, 2016, concerning access to abortion services in Italian hospitals. The decision, which has not received much attention by legal scholarship, is of utmost interest for the affirmation of womenʼs right to reproductive health. I will argue that this decision contributes to the affirmation of Statesʼ positive̶and not merely negative̶obligation to grant women access to safe abortion services.","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE CASE CGIL V. ITALY DECIDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS\",\"authors\":\"S. D. Vido\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/30079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to analyse the decision rendered by the European Committee of Social Rights in the case CGIL v. Italy, published on 11 April, 2016, concerning access to abortion services in Italian hospitals. The decision, which has not received much attention by legal scholarship, is of utmost interest for the affirmation of womenʼs right to reproductive health. I will argue that this decision contributes to the affirmation of Statesʼ positive̶and not merely negative̶obligation to grant women access to safe abortion services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/30079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/30079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析欧洲社会权利委员会在2016年4月11日公布的CGIL诉意大利一案中作出的关于在意大利医院获得堕胎服务的决定。这一决定没有受到法律界的太多关注,但对确认妇女的生殖健康权利具有极大的意义。我认为,这一决定有助于肯定各国给予妇女获得安全堕胎服务的积极——而不仅仅是消极——义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE CASE CGIL V. ITALY DECIDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS
The purpose of this article is to analyse the decision rendered by the European Committee of Social Rights in the case CGIL v. Italy, published on 11 April, 2016, concerning access to abortion services in Italian hospitals. The decision, which has not received much attention by legal scholarship, is of utmost interest for the affirmation of womenʼs right to reproductive health. I will argue that this decision contributes to the affirmation of Statesʼ positive̶and not merely negative̶obligation to grant women access to safe abortion services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信