泰国国家人工智能伦理准则分析

Soraj Hongladarom
{"title":"泰国国家人工智能伦理准则分析","authors":"Soraj Hongladarom","doi":"10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe paper aims to analyze the content of the newly published National AI Ethics Guideline in Thailand. Thailand’s ongoing political struggles and transformation has made it a good case to see how a policy document such as a guideline in AI ethics becomes part of the transformations. Looking at how the two are interrelated will help illuminate the political and cultural dynamics of Thailand as well as how governance of ethics itself is conceptualized.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe author looks at the history of how the National AI Ethics Guidelines came to be and interprets its content, situating the Guideline within the contemporary history of the country as well as comparing the Guideline with some of the leading existing guidelines.\n\n\nFindings\nIt is found that the Guideline represents an ambivalent and paradoxical nature that characterizes Thailand’s attempt at modernization. On the one hand, there is a desire to join the ranks of the more advanced economies, but, on the other hand, there is also a strong desire to maintain its own traditional values. Thailand has not been successful in resolving this tension yet, and this lack of success is shown in the way that content of the AI Ethics Guideline is presented.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of the paper could be useful for further attempts in drafting and revising AI ethics guidelines in the future.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper represents the first attempt, so far as the author is aware, to analyze the content of the Thai AI Ethics Guideline critically.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Thailand national AI ethics guideline: an analysis\",\"authors\":\"Soraj Hongladarom\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe paper aims to analyze the content of the newly published National AI Ethics Guideline in Thailand. Thailand’s ongoing political struggles and transformation has made it a good case to see how a policy document such as a guideline in AI ethics becomes part of the transformations. Looking at how the two are interrelated will help illuminate the political and cultural dynamics of Thailand as well as how governance of ethics itself is conceptualized.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe author looks at the history of how the National AI Ethics Guidelines came to be and interprets its content, situating the Guideline within the contemporary history of the country as well as comparing the Guideline with some of the leading existing guidelines.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIt is found that the Guideline represents an ambivalent and paradoxical nature that characterizes Thailand’s attempt at modernization. On the one hand, there is a desire to join the ranks of the more advanced economies, but, on the other hand, there is also a strong desire to maintain its own traditional values. Thailand has not been successful in resolving this tension yet, and this lack of success is shown in the way that content of the AI Ethics Guideline is presented.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of the paper could be useful for further attempts in drafting and revising AI ethics guidelines in the future.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper represents the first attempt, so far as the author is aware, to analyze the content of the Thai AI Ethics Guideline critically.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":156416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在分析泰国新发布的《国家人工智能伦理指南》的内容。泰国正在进行的政治斗争和转型,使其成为一个很好的案例,可以看到人工智能伦理准则等政策文件如何成为转型的一部分。看看这两者是如何相互关联的,将有助于阐明泰国的政治和文化动态,以及道德治理本身是如何概念化的。作者回顾了《国家人工智能伦理指南》形成的历史,并解释了其内容,将《指南》置于我国当代历史中,并将《指南》与现有的一些主要指南进行了比较。研究发现,该指导方针代表了泰国现代化尝试的矛盾和矛盾的性质。一方面,中国渴望加入更发达经济体的行列,但另一方面,中国也强烈希望保持自己的传统价值观。泰国还没有成功地解决这一紧张局势,这种缺乏成功的情况体现在人工智能道德准则的内容呈现方式上。本文的研究结果可能对未来起草和修订人工智能伦理准则的进一步尝试有用。据作者所知,本文是第一次尝试批判性地分析泰国人工智能伦理准则的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Thailand national AI ethics guideline: an analysis
Purpose The paper aims to analyze the content of the newly published National AI Ethics Guideline in Thailand. Thailand’s ongoing political struggles and transformation has made it a good case to see how a policy document such as a guideline in AI ethics becomes part of the transformations. Looking at how the two are interrelated will help illuminate the political and cultural dynamics of Thailand as well as how governance of ethics itself is conceptualized. Design/methodology/approach The author looks at the history of how the National AI Ethics Guidelines came to be and interprets its content, situating the Guideline within the contemporary history of the country as well as comparing the Guideline with some of the leading existing guidelines. Findings It is found that the Guideline represents an ambivalent and paradoxical nature that characterizes Thailand’s attempt at modernization. On the one hand, there is a desire to join the ranks of the more advanced economies, but, on the other hand, there is also a strong desire to maintain its own traditional values. Thailand has not been successful in resolving this tension yet, and this lack of success is shown in the way that content of the AI Ethics Guideline is presented. Practical implications The findings of the paper could be useful for further attempts in drafting and revising AI ethics guidelines in the future. Originality/value The paper represents the first attempt, so far as the author is aware, to analyze the content of the Thai AI Ethics Guideline critically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信