创新如何推动包容:网络心理干预的机遇与挑战

Diletta Mora, D. Girardi, N. Grinko, A. De Carlo
{"title":"创新如何推动包容:网络心理干预的机遇与挑战","authors":"Diletta Mora, D. Girardi, N. Grinko, A. De Carlo","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The current pandemic has had a huge impact on people’s psychophysical health with repercussions on the job dimension, leading to high levels of dissatisfaction and fear for the future. Online interventions have become very popular especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, in fact many psychologists and patients switched from face-to-face to online sessions to continue their psychological therapies. The scientific literature has shown strong evidence for online psychotherapy, with this application being used both as an alternative to traditional healthcare and as an enhancement of face-to-face treatment. Many studies highlight that online therapy, and the quality of therapeutic alliance seem to be equivalent in both modalities. There are additional barriers such as public stigma, cultural and language barriers, geographic isolation in rural areas and social isolation, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and online psychology interventions allow inclusion as they enable to involve many people who need psychological support, as well as to continue the psychological paths interrupted by the pandemic. A study was conducted to specifically analyze the implications that online psychology has on today's society. Through a structured interview, 23 psychologists were questioned with the aim to investigate different thematic areas relating to online psychological interventions. A qualitative analysis was conducted using the Atlas.ti software. All participants were part of a platform specifically designed for the provision of psychological services, managed by a structure registered with the NHS. One purpose of the study was to investigate psychologists' perceptions of online psychology rather than traditional therapy. Some limitations comprise the small sample of psychologists which may not be generalizable to the population at large. Further, another limitation is related to the digital divide ? the cultural bias inherent in accessing the Internet and all information and services that exist online as well as the lack of awareness of how the Internet can be used in a functional way. An interesting future discussion for counseling psychologists may be explored: blending online therapy into regular face-to-face sessions. In fact, the scientific literature shows that the combination between these two modalities has potential in secondary mental health care. The existing literature and the study we have conducted methodically highlight the social responsibility of the intervention, which has an impact on the society and is consistent with the key objectives of the 2030 agenda.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOW INNOVATION DRIVES INCLUSION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF ONLINE PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION\",\"authors\":\"Diletta Mora, D. Girardi, N. Grinko, A. De Carlo\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2022inpact094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"The current pandemic has had a huge impact on people’s psychophysical health with repercussions on the job dimension, leading to high levels of dissatisfaction and fear for the future. Online interventions have become very popular especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, in fact many psychologists and patients switched from face-to-face to online sessions to continue their psychological therapies. The scientific literature has shown strong evidence for online psychotherapy, with this application being used both as an alternative to traditional healthcare and as an enhancement of face-to-face treatment. Many studies highlight that online therapy, and the quality of therapeutic alliance seem to be equivalent in both modalities. There are additional barriers such as public stigma, cultural and language barriers, geographic isolation in rural areas and social isolation, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and online psychology interventions allow inclusion as they enable to involve many people who need psychological support, as well as to continue the psychological paths interrupted by the pandemic. A study was conducted to specifically analyze the implications that online psychology has on today's society. Through a structured interview, 23 psychologists were questioned with the aim to investigate different thematic areas relating to online psychological interventions. A qualitative analysis was conducted using the Atlas.ti software. All participants were part of a platform specifically designed for the provision of psychological services, managed by a structure registered with the NHS. One purpose of the study was to investigate psychologists' perceptions of online psychology rather than traditional therapy. Some limitations comprise the small sample of psychologists which may not be generalizable to the population at large. Further, another limitation is related to the digital divide ? the cultural bias inherent in accessing the Internet and all information and services that exist online as well as the lack of awareness of how the Internet can be used in a functional way. An interesting future discussion for counseling psychologists may be explored: blending online therapy into regular face-to-face sessions. In fact, the scientific literature shows that the combination between these two modalities has potential in secondary mental health care. The existing literature and the study we have conducted methodically highlight the social responsibility of the intervention, which has an impact on the society and is consistent with the key objectives of the 2030 agenda.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":120251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“当前的大流行对人们的身心健康产生了巨大影响,对工作产生了影响,导致对未来的高度不满和恐惧。在线干预变得非常流行,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,事实上,许多心理学家和患者从面对面转向在线治疗,以继续他们的心理治疗。科学文献显示了在线心理治疗的有力证据,这种应用程序既被用作传统医疗保健的替代方案,也被用作面对面治疗的增强。许多研究强调,在线治疗和治疗联盟的质量似乎是相等的两种方式。还有其他障碍,如公众耻辱感、文化和语言障碍、农村地区的地理隔离和社会隔离,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,在线心理干预措施有助于包容,因为它们使许多需要心理支持的人能够参与进来,并继续被大流行打断的心理道路。一项研究专门分析了网络心理学对当今社会的影响。通过结构化访谈,23名心理学家接受了采访,目的是调查与在线心理干预相关的不同主题领域。使用Atlas进行定性分析。ti的软件。所有参与者都是专门为提供心理服务而设计的平台的一部分,该平台由在NHS注册的机构管理。这项研究的目的之一是调查心理学家对网络心理学的看法,而不是传统的治疗方法。一些限制包括心理学家的小样本,这可能无法推广到广大人口。此外,另一个限制与数字鸿沟有关。访问互联网和在线存在的所有信息和服务所固有的文化偏见,以及缺乏对如何有效使用互联网的认识。咨询心理学家可能会探讨一个有趣的未来讨论:将在线治疗与定期的面对面治疗结合起来。事实上,科学文献表明,这两种模式的结合在二级精神卫生保健中具有潜力。现有文献和我们有条不紊地进行的研究强调了干预的社会责任,这对社会有影响,与2030年议程的关键目标是一致的。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HOW INNOVATION DRIVES INCLUSION: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF ONLINE PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION
"The current pandemic has had a huge impact on people’s psychophysical health with repercussions on the job dimension, leading to high levels of dissatisfaction and fear for the future. Online interventions have become very popular especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, in fact many psychologists and patients switched from face-to-face to online sessions to continue their psychological therapies. The scientific literature has shown strong evidence for online psychotherapy, with this application being used both as an alternative to traditional healthcare and as an enhancement of face-to-face treatment. Many studies highlight that online therapy, and the quality of therapeutic alliance seem to be equivalent in both modalities. There are additional barriers such as public stigma, cultural and language barriers, geographic isolation in rural areas and social isolation, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and online psychology interventions allow inclusion as they enable to involve many people who need psychological support, as well as to continue the psychological paths interrupted by the pandemic. A study was conducted to specifically analyze the implications that online psychology has on today's society. Through a structured interview, 23 psychologists were questioned with the aim to investigate different thematic areas relating to online psychological interventions. A qualitative analysis was conducted using the Atlas.ti software. All participants were part of a platform specifically designed for the provision of psychological services, managed by a structure registered with the NHS. One purpose of the study was to investigate psychologists' perceptions of online psychology rather than traditional therapy. Some limitations comprise the small sample of psychologists which may not be generalizable to the population at large. Further, another limitation is related to the digital divide ? the cultural bias inherent in accessing the Internet and all information and services that exist online as well as the lack of awareness of how the Internet can be used in a functional way. An interesting future discussion for counseling psychologists may be explored: blending online therapy into regular face-to-face sessions. In fact, the scientific literature shows that the combination between these two modalities has potential in secondary mental health care. The existing literature and the study we have conducted methodically highlight the social responsibility of the intervention, which has an impact on the society and is consistent with the key objectives of the 2030 agenda."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信