Sulis Setiowati, Zulfanahri, Eka Legya Franita, I. Ardiyanto
{"title":"人脸识别优化方法综述:深度学习与非深度学习方法的比较","authors":"Sulis Setiowati, Zulfanahri, Eka Legya Franita, I. Ardiyanto","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2017.8250484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, face recognition system is growing sustainably on a larger scope. A few years ago, face recognition was used as a personal identification with a limited scope, now this technology has grown in the field of security, in terms of preventing fraudsters, criminals, and terrorists. In addition, face recognition is also used in detecting how tired a driver is, reducing the occurrence of road accidents, as well as in marketing, advertising, health, and others. Many method are developed to give the best accuracy in face recognition. Deep learning approach become trend in this field because of stunning results, and fast computation. However, the problem about accuracy, complexity, and scalability become a challenges in face recognition. This paper focus on recognizing the importance of this technology, how to achieve high accuracy with low complexity. Deep learning and non-deep learning methods are discussed and compared to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. From critical analysis using experiment with YALE dataset, non-deep learning algorithm can reach up to 90.6% for low-high complexity and 94.67% in deep learning method for low-high complexity. Genetic algorithm combining with CNN and SVM was an optimization method for overcome accuracy and complexity problems.","PeriodicalId":267403,"journal":{"name":"2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of optimization method in face recognition: Comparison deep learning and non-deep learning methods\",\"authors\":\"Sulis Setiowati, Zulfanahri, Eka Legya Franita, I. Ardiyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITEED.2017.8250484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, face recognition system is growing sustainably on a larger scope. A few years ago, face recognition was used as a personal identification with a limited scope, now this technology has grown in the field of security, in terms of preventing fraudsters, criminals, and terrorists. In addition, face recognition is also used in detecting how tired a driver is, reducing the occurrence of road accidents, as well as in marketing, advertising, health, and others. Many method are developed to give the best accuracy in face recognition. Deep learning approach become trend in this field because of stunning results, and fast computation. However, the problem about accuracy, complexity, and scalability become a challenges in face recognition. This paper focus on recognizing the importance of this technology, how to achieve high accuracy with low complexity. Deep learning and non-deep learning methods are discussed and compared to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. From critical analysis using experiment with YALE dataset, non-deep learning algorithm can reach up to 90.6% for low-high complexity and 94.67% in deep learning method for low-high complexity. Genetic algorithm combining with CNN and SVM was an optimization method for overcome accuracy and complexity problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2017.8250484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2017.8250484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of optimization method in face recognition: Comparison deep learning and non-deep learning methods
Currently, face recognition system is growing sustainably on a larger scope. A few years ago, face recognition was used as a personal identification with a limited scope, now this technology has grown in the field of security, in terms of preventing fraudsters, criminals, and terrorists. In addition, face recognition is also used in detecting how tired a driver is, reducing the occurrence of road accidents, as well as in marketing, advertising, health, and others. Many method are developed to give the best accuracy in face recognition. Deep learning approach become trend in this field because of stunning results, and fast computation. However, the problem about accuracy, complexity, and scalability become a challenges in face recognition. This paper focus on recognizing the importance of this technology, how to achieve high accuracy with low complexity. Deep learning and non-deep learning methods are discussed and compared to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. From critical analysis using experiment with YALE dataset, non-deep learning algorithm can reach up to 90.6% for low-high complexity and 94.67% in deep learning method for low-high complexity. Genetic algorithm combining with CNN and SVM was an optimization method for overcome accuracy and complexity problems.