重温老朋友:CoDel真的实现了RED无法实现的目标吗?

N. Kuhn, E. Lochin, O. Mehani
{"title":"重温老朋友:CoDel真的实现了RED无法实现的目标吗?","authors":"N. Kuhn, E. Lochin, O. Mehani","doi":"10.1145/2630088.2630094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use ns-2 simulations to compare RED's gentle_ mode to CoDel in terms of their ability to reduce the latency for various TCP variants. We use a common dumbbell topol- ogy with Pareto background traffic, and measure the packet delays and transmission time of a 10 MB FTP transfer. In our scenarios, we find that CoDel reduces the latency by 87%, but RED still manages to reduce it by 75%. However, the use of CoDel results in a transmission time 42% longer than when using RED. In light of its maturity, we therefore argue that RED could be considered as a good candidate to tackle Bufferbloat.","PeriodicalId":106412,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting old friends: is CoDel really achieving what RED cannot?\",\"authors\":\"N. Kuhn, E. Lochin, O. Mehani\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2630088.2630094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use ns-2 simulations to compare RED's gentle_ mode to CoDel in terms of their ability to reduce the latency for various TCP variants. We use a common dumbbell topol- ogy with Pareto background traffic, and measure the packet delays and transmission time of a 10 MB FTP transfer. In our scenarios, we find that CoDel reduces the latency by 87%, but RED still manages to reduce it by 75%. However, the use of CoDel results in a transmission time 42% longer than when using RED. In light of its maturity, we therefore argue that RED could be considered as a good candidate to tackle Bufferbloat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2630088.2630094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2630088.2630094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

我们使用ns-2模拟来比较RED的绅士模式与CoDel在减少各种TCP变体延迟方面的能力。我们使用一个常见的哑铃拓扑与帕累托背景流量,并测量数据包延迟和传输时间的10mb FTP传输。在我们的场景中,我们发现CoDel将延迟减少了87%,但RED仍然设法将延迟减少了75%。然而,使用CoDel导致的传输时间比使用RED时长42%。鉴于其成熟度,我们认为RED可以被视为解决Bufferbloat的一个很好的候选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting old friends: is CoDel really achieving what RED cannot?
We use ns-2 simulations to compare RED's gentle_ mode to CoDel in terms of their ability to reduce the latency for various TCP variants. We use a common dumbbell topol- ogy with Pareto background traffic, and measure the packet delays and transmission time of a 10 MB FTP transfer. In our scenarios, we find that CoDel reduces the latency by 87%, but RED still manages to reduce it by 75%. However, the use of CoDel results in a transmission time 42% longer than when using RED. In light of its maturity, we therefore argue that RED could be considered as a good candidate to tackle Bufferbloat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信