创造性思维分析和初中生在生物学习方面的创造性思维发展过程

Hilman M. Firdaus, Ari Widodo, Diana Rochintaniawati
{"title":"创造性思维分析和初中生在生物学习方面的创造性思维发展过程","authors":"Hilman M. Firdaus, Ari Widodo, Diana Rochintaniawati","doi":"10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to analyse students’ creative thinking ability and the process involved in the development of students’ creative thinking, as well as to examine the differences between male and female students, in order to provide a better understanding of both gender in creative thinking ability. Creative thinking is represented by four indicators; fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. In this research students’ creative thinking was measured by using a Test of Creative Thinking Ability, which consisted of five open-ended questions, while the process of creative thinking development was obeserved throughout the classroom teaching-learning activities, as well as the strategies and approaches implied by the teacher. The result showed student’s creative thinking ability was adequate (59%), in which the students scored the highest number in fluency (71,2%), followed by elaboration (59,5%), originality (58,5%), and flexibility (46,8%). Meanwhile, the process of creative thinking development was considered generally adequate in supporting students’ creative thinking ability, the score of the whole process in each indicators were: fluency (85,7%), flexibility (85,7%), originality (78,5%), elaboration (94,5%). Quantitative data analysis showed a statistically different results of fluency and elaboration between male and female students, while the result in flexibility and originality showed no-significant difference between both gender. Positive response related to students’ perception about their creative thinking ability were obtained using the students’ questionnaire as the instrument. Most of the students had a great perception of ther creative ability, where male students tend to have higher perspective about their creative ability than female students.","PeriodicalId":228210,"journal":{"name":"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Proses Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Biologi\",\"authors\":\"Hilman M. Firdaus, Ari Widodo, Diana Rochintaniawati\",\"doi\":\"10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research was to analyse students’ creative thinking ability and the process involved in the development of students’ creative thinking, as well as to examine the differences between male and female students, in order to provide a better understanding of both gender in creative thinking ability. Creative thinking is represented by four indicators; fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. In this research students’ creative thinking was measured by using a Test of Creative Thinking Ability, which consisted of five open-ended questions, while the process of creative thinking development was obeserved throughout the classroom teaching-learning activities, as well as the strategies and approaches implied by the teacher. The result showed student’s creative thinking ability was adequate (59%), in which the students scored the highest number in fluency (71,2%), followed by elaboration (59,5%), originality (58,5%), and flexibility (46,8%). Meanwhile, the process of creative thinking development was considered generally adequate in supporting students’ creative thinking ability, the score of the whole process in each indicators were: fluency (85,7%), flexibility (85,7%), originality (78,5%), elaboration (94,5%). Quantitative data analysis showed a statistically different results of fluency and elaboration between male and female students, while the result in flexibility and originality showed no-significant difference between both gender. Positive response related to students’ perception about their creative thinking ability were obtained using the students’ questionnaire as the instrument. Most of the students had a great perception of ther creative ability, where male students tend to have higher perspective about their creative ability than female students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本研究的目的是分析学生的创造性思维能力和学生创造性思维发展的过程,并检查男女学生之间的差异,以便更好地了解两性在创造性思维能力方面的差异。创造性思维表现为四个指标;流利、灵活、有独创性和精雕细琢。本研究采用由五个开放式问题组成的创造性思维能力测试来测量学生的创造性思维,并在整个课堂教学活动中观察创造性思维的发展过程,以及教师暗示的策略和方法。结果显示,学生的创造性思维能力是足够的(59%),其中流畅性得分最高(71.2%),其次是阐述(59.5%),独创性(58.5%)和灵活性(46.8%)。同时,创造性思维发展的过程被认为对学生创造性思维能力的支持总体上是足够的,整个过程中各指标的得分分别为:流畅性(85,7%)、灵活性(85,7%)、独创性(78,5%)、精化(94,5%)。定量数据分析显示,男女学生在流利性和阐述性方面的结果有统计学差异,而在灵活性和独创性方面的结果男女差异不显著。以学生问卷为工具,学生对其创造性思维能力的认知得到了积极的回应。大多数学生对自己的创造能力有较高的认知,其中男生对自己的创造能力的认知往往高于女生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Proses Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Biologi
The aim of this research was to analyse students’ creative thinking ability and the process involved in the development of students’ creative thinking, as well as to examine the differences between male and female students, in order to provide a better understanding of both gender in creative thinking ability. Creative thinking is represented by four indicators; fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. In this research students’ creative thinking was measured by using a Test of Creative Thinking Ability, which consisted of five open-ended questions, while the process of creative thinking development was obeserved throughout the classroom teaching-learning activities, as well as the strategies and approaches implied by the teacher. The result showed student’s creative thinking ability was adequate (59%), in which the students scored the highest number in fluency (71,2%), followed by elaboration (59,5%), originality (58,5%), and flexibility (46,8%). Meanwhile, the process of creative thinking development was considered generally adequate in supporting students’ creative thinking ability, the score of the whole process in each indicators were: fluency (85,7%), flexibility (85,7%), originality (78,5%), elaboration (94,5%). Quantitative data analysis showed a statistically different results of fluency and elaboration between male and female students, while the result in flexibility and originality showed no-significant difference between both gender. Positive response related to students’ perception about their creative thinking ability were obtained using the students’ questionnaire as the instrument. Most of the students had a great perception of ther creative ability, where male students tend to have higher perspective about their creative ability than female students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信